Reconstruction of Chekhova Street from Nyzhnia Horova Street to Hetmana Sahaidachnogo Street, Cherkasy


Sector
Transport Sector
Stream
Development and restoration of road infrastructure
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Improving the condition of infrastructure

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The improvement of the city's infrastructure, namely Chekhov Street on the section from Nyzhnia Horova Street to Hetmana Sagaidachnogo Street, will be carried out through its reconstruction. The reconstruction is planned to be carried out within the red lines from the intersection with Nyzhnia Horova Street to the beginning of the intersection with Hetmana Sagaidachnogo Street.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

General Plan of Cherkasy city Chekhova st. main street of city significance. Street parameters to be adopted according to DBN V2.3.5-2018: - Number of lanes of the carriageway – 2 (1 in each direction). - Arrangement of junctions at intersections and exits to groups of houses; - Arrangement of bicycle lanes along the carriageway of the street; - Partial reconstruction of sidewalks within the street section; - Arrangement of surface drainage and into the existing storm sewer; - Bringing the height of existing curbstones to the regulatory one; - Arrangement of markings of the carriageway with stable materials (thermoplastic, cold plastic); - Arrangement of vertical mark differences at the intersection of sidewalks and the carriageway smoothly (ramps) without sharp drops and sharp corners. After the reconstruction, Chekhova st. from st. Nyzhnya Horova to Hetmana Sahaidachnogo St. will meet the stated purpose.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Other functional

2.11 km

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Transport Sector

Subsector

Road transport and road infrastructure

Stream

Development and restoration of road infrastructure

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

DEVELOPMENT AND MODERNIZATION OF URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Аналіз пропускної здатності вулично-дорожньої мережі
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
400000 vehicles
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?

No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?

Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?

Focus groups or consultations with women and vulnerable groups were held
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Feedback on the project design was received from organizations working with women
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Women's participation is ensured at various stages of planning (including public hearings)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?

All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
A plan to mitigate negative social impacts focused on women has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
All possible negative impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?

A policy/code of conduct on non-discrimination and gender equality has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Mandatory training for project staff on gender equality and inclusion is provided
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Expert opinion Chekhov.pdf
19.02.2026
07:56:32 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Reconstruction of Chekhova Street from Nyzhnia Horova Street to Hetmana Sahaidachnogo Street, Cherkasy

Technical Solution 2

Reconstruction of Chekhova Street

Total costs59'304'672 UAH57'000'001 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 1'453'500 UAH2'000'000 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 49'803'626 UAH50'000'000 UAH
  • For operation
  • 1 UAH1 UAH
  • For closing
  • 8'047'545 UAH5'000'000 UAH
    Average annual costs1 UAH1 UAH
    Project duration, incl.24 months24 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 12 months12 months
  • Implementation period
  • 12 months12 months
    Service life144 months120 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Rejected

    [The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    1
    To components
    0

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, both national and international

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
    Стратегію визначено відповідно до Закону України "Про публічні закупівлі"

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
    Відповідно до Закону України "Про публічні закупівлі"

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
    Open competitive bidding

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Pre-market engagement
    Not conducted

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Potential market participants
    Not conducted

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Market readiness assessment
    not applicable

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget59'304'672 UAH57'000'001 UAH
    Capital costs59'304'672 UAH57'000'001 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation1'453'500 UAH2'000'000 UAH
    For implementation49'803'626 UAH50'000'000 UAH
    For operation1 UAH1 UAH
    For closing8'047'545 UAH5'000'000 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service Unitне застосовується
    Service Unit Cost1 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management Rationale

    Team competencies

    Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of available procurement options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of the market environment

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
    Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
    None of the options are applicable
    Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
    Partially, we are considering options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
    Environmental experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial consultants/modelers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Legal consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Technical experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Social/gender consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management experts / project managers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Risk assessment

    Financial riskDefinedUndefined

    Organizational events

    ResponseDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable
    Need for financing

    Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Approval History

    DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasons
    19/02/2026SP-L-190226-A0F0D664Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-
    02/03/2026SPP-L-020326-79A34F4BCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-