Reconstruction of the main pressure water supply pipeline between the village of Tverdomedovo and the village of Bila Krynytsia, Velykoleksandrivska settlement territorial community, Beryslav district, Kherson region


Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Development and rehabilitation of municipal infrastructure of subnational governments
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project involves the reconstruction of the main pressure water supply system between the village of Tverdomedove and the village of Bila Krynytsia of the Velikooleksandrivska settlement territorial community of the Beryslav district of the Kherson region. The implementation includes the replacement of worn sections of the water supply network using polyethylene pipes PE100 SDR11 with a diameter of 90 mm and 110 mm with a total length of 11.195 km, the installation of shut-off valves, the arrangement of water supply wells, as well as the construction of two water pressure towers of the Rozhnovsky type with a volume of 25 m³ each. The project is aimed at solving the problems of critical physical wear and tear of the existing water supply system, frequent accidents, water losses and unstable pressure in the network, which negatively affects the uninterrupted provision of the population with drinking water and fire-fighting needs. The expected results of the project implementation are to increase the reliability and continuity of centralized water supply, reduce accident rates and operating costs, ensure regulatory pressure in the network, improve sanitary and epidemiological living conditions for the population, and create conditions for the sustainable functioning of the community's engineering infrastructure.

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Improving the condition of infrastructure

Secondary goal:

Improving the quality of services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The key problem is the critical physical wear and tear of the existing main pressure water pipeline between the village of Tverdomedove and the village of Bila Krynytsia, which does not provide the proper level of reliability and uninterrupted water transportation. Wear and tear of pipelines and shut-off valves leads to frequent emergencies, water leaks, loss of pressure and increased operating costs. The urgency of solving these problems is due to the long service life of the water pipeline, accumulated wear and tear of engineering networks and the lack of the possibility of further effective operation without comprehensive reconstruction. Further use of the existing infrastructure without updating creates risks of complete failure of the main water pipeline, which can lead to interruptions in water supply, complications in the operation of the system in emergency conditions and additional costs for emergency repairs. If the problems are not resolved, further deterioration of the technical condition of the water pipeline, an increase in the accident rate, increased water losses and a decrease in the operational safety of the linear engineering infrastructure facility is possible. The implementation of the project will allow restoring the reliability and durability of the main pressure water supply system, reducing the accident rate and water losses, ensuring stable hydraulic transportation parameters, increasing operational safety, and creating conditions for the sustainable functioning of the water supply system within the Velikooleksandrivska settlement territorial community.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Population in the geographical area of influence of the project

803 human

Number of IDPs in the geographical area of impact of the project

95 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Municipal infrastructure and services

Subsector

Development and Reconstruction of Subnational Infrastructure

Stream

Development and rehabilitation of municipal infrastructure of subnational governments

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

1.1.2 Ensure the development of cultural and local heritage protection centers that form local self-awareness and bind residents to their places of residence

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Number of water towers on the main
0 units
2 units
Length of main pressure water pipe in satisfactory technical condition
0 m
11195 m
Share of reconstructed main water supply
0 %
100 %

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Оцінка попиту здійснювалася на основі аналізу фактичної експлуатації існуючого магістрального напірного водопроводу та проєктних розрахунків у межах його реконструкції без зміни функціонального призначення і потужності.

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

No

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes

Так, у прогнозі попиту враховано актуальні демографічні та економічні тенденції, оскільки проєктні рішення з реконструкції магістрального напірного водопроводу приймалися з урахуванням фактичного навантаження на інфраструктуру та очікуваних умов її експлуатації без збільшення розрахункової потужності.

Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
22
222 cm
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

The project may result in the forced displacement of women, men and other gender groups or loss of access to resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Other gender risks
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
There are risks of impaired mobility or safety for women, men and other gender groups during construction/operation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
There is a risk of reduced economic opportunities for women, men and other gender groups (e.g. loss of jobs or retail outlets)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Other benefits from project implementation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Envisaged training or advanced training for women in the private sector
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Contract (1)_compressed.pdf
16.01.2026
13:11:24 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Reconstruction of the main pressure water supply pipeline between the village of Tverdomedovo and the village of Bila Krynytsia, Velykoleksandrivska settlement territorial community, Beryslav district, Kherson region

Technical Solution 2

Current repairs and emergency restoration work on the existing main pressure water pipeline between the village of Tverdomedove and the village of Bila Krynytsia

Total costs22'466'664 UAH7'097'500 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 550'000 UAH500'000 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 21'566'837 UAH6'500'000 UAH
  • For operation
  • 349'826 UAH97'500 UAH
  • For closing
  • 1 UAH0 UAH
    Average annual costs349'826 UAH97'500 UAH
    Project duration, incl.35 months5 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 1 month1 month
  • Implementation period
  • 34 months4 months
    Service life360 months84 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Rejected

    [The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    0
    To components
    0

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, both national and international

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget22'466'664 UAH7'097'500 UAH
    Capital costs22'466'664 UAH7'097'500 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation550'000 UAH500'000 UAH
    For implementation21'566'837 UAH6'500'000 UAH
    For operation349'826 UAH97'500 UAH
    For closing1 UAH0 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitНе застосовується
    Service Unit Cost1 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds4'307'715 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds4'307'715 UAH0 UAH

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    Other
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]