Reconstruction of the water supply from the 2nd lifting station to the 3rd lifting station at the address: Ukraine, Kyiv region, Fastiv district, Boyarsk urban territorial community
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Restoration, development and modernization of centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources
Maturity level
78
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The project to reconstruct the water supply from the II-th lifting station to the III-th lifting station in the Boyarska community involves the renewal of worn-out pipes and equipment to improve the reliability of water supply. The goal is to eliminate accidents, reduce water losses and unstable pressure, which will ensure a stable supply of high-quality drinking water to the community. The reconstruction will also increase the energy efficiency of pumping stations and improve the ecological condition of the region. It is expected that this will contribute to a better life for residents and sustainable development of the territory.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions
Secondary Goal:
Improving the condition of infrastructure
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
The goal of the water supply reconstruction project is to ensure a reliable and stable water supply for the Boyarska community by replacing worn-out pipes and upgrading pumping equipment. To achieve this goal, the pipe sleeve method is used to intervene without large-scale destruction of the existing infrastructure, which allows avoiding accidents and reducing repair costs. The gap between the current state and the target level is the significant wear of the network, loss of pressure, accidents and water shortages, which create risks for the quality and reliability of the community's water supply. The reconstruction will eliminate these problems and improve the quality of life of residents.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The key problems of the project are the breakdown and deterioration of the water supply, unstable pressure and inconsistent water supply, which creates risks for the quality and availability of drinking water. These problems are relevant due to the worn-out infrastructure, which causes frequent breakdowns and water waste. If not resolved, the population will face frequent interruptions, reduced sanitary standards and social inconvenience. The implementation of the project will ensure stable pressure, reduce breakdowns, improve water quality and raise the standard of living of residents, creating the prerequisites for sustainable development of the community.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of people who will use the service
90 %
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Subsector
Water supply and sanitation
Stream
Restoration, development and modernization of centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
2.3.1 Ensure proper functioning of existing water supply, drainage and heat supply facilities, taking into account modern energy-saving technologies
Project objectives
Project objectives were not specified by the initiator
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
Методологія оцінки попиту проєкту базується на аналізі технічного стану мережі, кількості споживачів і прогнозі потреб у воді. Збирають статистичні дані, опитують мешканців і підприємства, враховують вимоги до якості та обсягів водопостачання. Це дозволяє розрахувати обсяги реконструкції й оцінити вплив проєкту на стабільність і якість водопостачання в громаді.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
250000 m3
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Reconstruction of the water supply from the 2nd lifting station to the 3rd lifting station at the address: Ukraine, Kyiv region, Fastiv district, Boyarsk urban territorial community
Technical Solution 2
Using trenchless repair technologies, such as hydromechanical sleeving or threading new pipes into old ones without digging up the roadway.
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)32'020'000 UAH16'000'000 UAH
For preparation1'020'000 UAH1'000'000 UAH
For implementation31'000'000 UAH15'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost2'980'000 UAH550'000 UAH
For operation2'730'000 UAH300'000 UAH
For closing250'000 UAH250'000 UAH
Average annual costs300'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.24 months12 months
Deadline for developing a FFS12 months6 months
Implementation period12 months6 months
Service life300 months7 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget35'000'000 UAH16'550'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)32'020'000 UAH16'000'000 UAH
For preparation1'020'000 UAH1'000'000 UAH
For implementation31'000'000 UAH15'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost2'980'000 UAH550'000 UAH
For operation2'730'000 UAH300'000 UAH
For closing250'000 UAH250'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitДля розрахунку середньої вартості проєкту реконструкції водогону на одного отримувача послуги з урахуванням 25,000 жителів, загальна вартість проєкту (35,000,000 грн) ділиться на загальну кількість отримувачів протягом усього періоду експлуатації (25 років): Кількість отримувачів за весь період: 25000 × 25 = 625000 . Середня вартість на одного отримувача послуги за рік: 35000000/625000 ≈ 56 грн
Service Unit Cost56 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
No – analysis not performed
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds33'985'240 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - communication with stakeholders
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - risk management
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - public consultations
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - legal support
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial analysis - financial analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - environmental expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of the market environment
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Yes, negotiations are already underway.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Economic riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
11/11/2025SP-L-111125-16DD6A24Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeStrategic fit confirmed.-
23/03/2026SP-N-230326-2DB3812FState SPInvestment Feasibility StudyAwaiting review--
17/11/2025SPP-L-171125-A65CBAC2Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeStrategic fit confirmed78