New construction of a technical means of traffic regulation (traffic light facility) at the intersection of Heroes of the UPA and Saints Peter and Paul Streets in the city of Sokal, Lviv region
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Development and rehabilitation of municipal infrastructure of subnational governments
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The project provides for the installation of accessibility elements for people with visual impairments (sound signaling devices), the installation of contrasting lighting of pedestrian crossings. The use of progressive technologies, new materials, galvanized metal supports with anti-corrosion protection and a manufacturer's warranty is envisaged.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Creation of new facilities and services
Secondary Goal:
Improving the condition of infrastructure
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
The purpose of the project is not just to install a traffic light facility, but to comprehensively improve safety and regulate traffic at a specific intersection. The construction of a traffic light facility at the intersection of Heroes of the UPA and Saints Peter and Paul Streets aims to:
- reduce the number of road accidents;
- increase the safety of pedestrians (especially children and the elderly);
- optimize traffic flows;
- bring traffic management up to modern standards.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
As a result of the significant intensity of traffic flows on the main road, as well as taking into account the presence of an unregulated pedestrian crossing, there are constantly intersections of vehicles and people, which leads to the creation of emergency situations and road accidents. From the point of view of the intensity of traffic flows, the introduction of traffic light regulation on the highway is fully justified.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Population in the geographical area of influence of the project
20373 thous. people
Number of IDPs in the geographical area of impact of the project
1040 thous. people
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Subsector
Development and Reconstruction of Subnational Infrastructure
Stream
Development and rehabilitation of municipal infrastructure of subnational governments
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
2.1.1. Modernization of roads, sidewalks, green areas and public spaces
Project objectives
Project objectives were not specified by the initiator
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
проводився статистичний аналіз даних про ДТП на даному перехрестку
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
51397 thous. people
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
New construction of a technical means of traffic regulation (traffic light facility) at the intersection of Heroes of the UPA and Saints Peter and Paul Streets in the city of Sokal, Lviv region
Technical Solution 2
New construction of a roundabout (roundabout) at the intersection of Heroes of the UPA and Saints Peter and Paul Streets in the city of Sokal, Lviv region
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)1'854'410 UAH3'000'000 UAH
For preparation83'624 UAH0 UAH
For implementation1'770'786 UAH3'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost0 UAH0 UAH
Average annual costs100'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.13 months13 months
Deadline for developing a FFS1 month1 month
Implementation period12 months12 months
Service life720 months720 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget1'854'410 UAH3'000'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)1'854'410 UAH3'000'000 UAH
For preparation83'624 UAH0 UAH
For implementation1'770'786 UAH3'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost0 UAH0 UAH
For operation0 UAH0 UAH
For closing0 UAH0 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service Unitотримувачі послуги(51397)
Service Unit Cost36 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds83'624 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds83'624 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
21/04/2026SP-L-210426-D971859BCommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeinclude in sectoral portfolio-
23/04/2026SPP-L-230426-65508E08Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyCanceled--
23/04/2026SPP-L-230426-F91EC20FCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeThe Local Investment Council of the Sokal City Council of the Lviv Region included the project in the Unified Project Portfolio of the Sokal Community for 2026 according to the minutes of the meeting of the Local Investment Council of the Sokal City Council of the Lviv Region dated April 23, 2026.-