New construction of a civil defense protective structure (CPS) on the territory of Bereznehuvaty Gymnasium No. 2 of the Bereznehuvaty Village Council located at: 12 Nezalezhnosti St., Bereznehuvaty village, Bashtansky district, Mykolaiv region
Sector
Education and science
Stream
Safe educational environment: shelter in secondary education institutions
Maturity level
79
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The project "New construction of a civil defense protective structure (CPS) on the territory of Bereznehuvat Gymnasium No. 2" involves the construction of a separate underground building designed for 239 people (203 students and 36 employees, including 9 places for people with disabilities).
The purpose of the project
Main goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards
Secondary goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards, Creation of new facilities and services, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions, Improving the quality of services
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
The purpose of the project "New Construction of the PRU of Gymnasium No. 2" is to modernize the infrastructure of the institution to ensure the safety of students and employees in accordance with modern state standards. The project involves the creation of a reliable, energy-efficient and comfortable anti-radiation shelter, equipped with all the necessary life support systems. The implementation of the project will contribute to increasing the level of civil protection, improving the conditions of stay during emergencies.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
Problems solved by the project: lack of proper shelter on the territory of the educational institution for participants in the educational process; danger of radioactive contamination and other emergencies, since the village of Bereznehuvate is located in the zone of possible impact of such factors; need to create a modern, safe civil defense infrastructure for children and gymnasium employees.
Expected results: providing shelter for 100% of participants in the educational process in the event of emergencies or military actions; increasing the level of civil defense of the community and public safety; creating conditions for the continuity of the educational process even in conditions of military threat; fulfilling state requirements for equipping educational institutions with protective civil defense structures.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of users from low-mobility population groups
9 human
Number of people who will use the service
180 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Education and science
Subsector
School education
Stream
Safe educational environment: shelter in secondary education institutions
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
2.1.1 Ensure the quality, accessibility, safety, and inclusiveness of educational services and improve the material and technical base of educational institutions
Project objectives
Project objectives were not specified by the initiator
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?
Yes, it was conducted
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?
None of the options are applicable
Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?
None of the options are applicable
Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?
None of the options are applicable
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
New construction of a civil defense protective structure (CPS) on the territory of Bereznehuvaty Gymnasium No. 2 of the Bereznehuvaty Village Council located at: 12 Nezalezhnosti St., Bereznehuvaty village, Bashtansky district, Mykolaiv region
Technical Solution 2
Mobile shelter for Bereznehuvat Gymnasium No. 2
Total costs93'127'387 UAH3'000'003 UAH
Average annual costs50'000 UAH100'000 UAH
Project duration, incl.26 months3 months
Service life1200 months240 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Для реалізації проєкту обрано конкурентну стратегію закупівель через систему публічних електронних торгів (Prozorro).
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Для реалізації проєкту обрано конкурентну стратегію закупівель через систему публічних електронних торгів (Prozorro).
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Competitive dialogue
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Direct negotiation procedures
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pre-market engagement
Попереднє залучення ринку залучено у вигляді консультацій з експертами, аналізі аналогічних проектів.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Potential market participants
Реалізація проекту буде забезпечена надійними постачальниками, підрядниками.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Market readiness assessment
Ринок повністю готовий до реалізації проекту.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget93'127'387 UAH3'000'003 UAH
Capital costs93'127'387 UAH3'000'003 UAH
Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH
Preliminary cost breakdown
Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
For preparation1 UAH1 UAH
For implementation93'127'384 UAH3'000'000 UAH
For operation1 UAH1 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitСередня вартість проєкту на одного отримувача послуги
Service Unit Cost517'374 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
None of the options are applicable
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Partially, we have limited experience
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Environmental experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial consultants/modelers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Legal consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Commercial experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic analysts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Technical experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management experts / project managers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Organizational events
ResponseDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
17/10/2025SP-L-171025-329F9638Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeDraft decision - to include in the sectoral portfolio.-
11/01/2026SP-N-110126-8BA70A7EState SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
28/10/2025SPP-L-281025-10208797Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-79