"New construction of a local automated centralized notification system in Mankivska settlement territorial community, Uman district, Cherkasy region"

Sector
Public safety
Stream
Strengthening the technical capacity of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine to respond to the challenges of martial law
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

A complex of organizational and technical measures, equipment and technical means of notification, equipment, means and channels of communication, information systems of enterprises, institutions and organizations, designed to timely deliver signals and information about the occurrence of emergency situations to management bodies and civil defense forces in the territory of settlements of the community. MASCO provides for interaction with the territorial centralized notification system based on the "WARNING AUDIO" equipment. The system provides notification of open areas through slot loudspeakers that are part of the electronic siren, as well as transmission of messages from the automated workplace to responsible officials using SMS and messengers thanks to the "Stfalcon STS" software.

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Creation of new facilities and services

Secondary Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The purpose of establishing modern systems and means of alerting and informing the population is to automate the processes of promptly delivering to the duty services of central and local executive bodies, local self-government bodies, territorial bodies and divisions of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine, enterprises, institutions, organizations and the population (including taking into account the peculiarities of alerting persons with physical, mental, intellectual, sensory disorders) signals and messages about the threat or occurrence of emergencies of a natural, man-made and military nature, and constant information about the situation in the area of possible damage.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The implementation of the project will allow for the automation of the processes of promptly reporting to the duty services of central and local executive bodies, the local unit of the State Emergency Service, enterprises, organizations, institutions and the population (including taking into account the specifics of notifying persons with physical, mental, intellectual, sensory disorders) signals and messages about the threat or occurrence of emergencies of a natural, man-made and military nature, and constantly informing them about the situation in the area of possible damage.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Population in the geographical area of influence of the project

17985 human

Number of IDPs in the geographical area of impact of the project

3652 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Public safety

Subsector

Civil defense

Stream

Strengthening the technical capacity of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine to respond to the challenges of martial law

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

2.2.1. Increasing community capacity to prevent, respond to, and mitigate the consequences of emergencies

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Alert base stations
0 units
17 units
Automated workplace
0 units
1 units

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Кількість, населених пунктів та чисельність населення в громаді.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
2486.66 thous. UAH
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
5274.07 thous. UAH
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

None of the options are applicable

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
expert report_MASCO_pdf.pdf
11.11.2025
13:10:06 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

New construction of a local automated centralized notification system in Mankivska settlement territorial community, Uman district, Cherkasy region

Technical Solution 2

New construction of a local automated centralized notification system in Mankivska settlement territorial community, Uman district, Cherkasy region

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)7'123'961 UAH7'123'961 UAH
For preparation99'816 UAH99'816 UAH
For implementation7'024'145 UAH7'024'145 UAH
Project operation and closure cost637'402 UAH637'402 UAH
For operation535'078 UAH535'078 UAH
For closing102'324 UAH102'324 UAH
Average annual costs30'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.39 months39 months
Deadline for developing a FFS3 months3 months
Implementation period36 months36 months
Service life180 months180 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Unsuccessful

[The technical approach was analyzed and considered for implementation but was not selected as the final option.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
1
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Yes, only national

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget7'761'363 UAH7'761'363 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)7'123'961 UAH7'123'961 UAH
For preparation99'816 UAH99'816 UAH
For implementation7'024'145 UAH7'024'145 UAH
Project operation and closure cost637'402 UAH637'402 UAH
For operation535'078 UAH535'078 UAH
For closing102'324 UAH102'324 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service Unit17 одиниць базових станцій17 одиниць базових станцій
Service Unit Cost456'550 UAH456'550 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesYes

Funding Sources

Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No, no assessment was conducted.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - economic analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
No, this is the first project of its kind.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No, this is the first project of its kind.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
No, I need help.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No, I need help.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Technical riskUndefinedDefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
12/11/2025SP-L-121125-351BB037Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--