Major repairs of a non-residential building with the installation of a heating point at the address: village of Zhornivka, Ozernyi lane, 4A

Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Updating the fund of civil defense protective structures (radiation shelters) and special social infrastructure facilities, in particular administrative buildings, public spaces in populated areas
Maturity level
72
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project involves major repairs of a non-residential building at the address: village of Zhornivka, Ozernyi lane, 4A, with the installation of a heating point. The purpose of the project is to create a comfortable and safe place for people to temporarily stay during the cold season, especially for vulnerable groups of the population. The main tasks are: eliminating technical deficiencies in the building, modernizing heating systems, insulating the premises and ensuring a minimum level of comfort. The project solves the problem of the lack of an accessible heating point, which will improve the social protection of local residents in the winter. Expected results: a functional heating point with efficient heating, improved energy efficiency of the building, increased safety and social comfort for the village population.

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Creation of new facilities and services

Secondary Goal:

Improving the equality of wealth distribution

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The project goal is to create a safe and comfortable heating point for the population of the village of Zhornivka in a non-residential building, which will protect people from hypothermia during the cold season. To achieve the goal, the building will be overhauled with insulation of walls and roofs, installation of an effective heating system, as well as provision of the necessary internal infrastructure for a comfortable stay. The gap between the current state and the target level is the lack of proper conditions for heating and a comfortable stay in the building. The non-residential building is in unsatisfactory technical condition, which does not allow it to be used as a heating point, which creates a social problem for local residents in the winter.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The key problems of the project are the lack of a proper heating point, which poses a threat to the life and health of the population of the village of Zhornivka in the winter, especially for vulnerable groups. The existing building is in poor technical condition, which makes it impossible to use it effectively for this purpose. These problems are relevant now due to the growing need to provide social protection in the cold season, which is becoming especially important in the context of climate change and economic difficulties. If not resolved, the possible consequences are hypothermia, a threat to life, and social tension. The implementation of the project will provide a safe heating point, improve social protection of the population, reduce risks to health and life in winter, and also create comfortable conditions for temporary stay in the cold season.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

1000 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Municipal infrastructure and services

Subsector

Protective Structures for Infrastructure Facilities

Stream

Updating the fund of civil defense protective structures (radiation shelters) and special social infrastructure facilities, in particular administrative buildings, public spaces in populated areas

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

3.3.3 Ensure physical accessibility for different social groups

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Методологія базується на зборі та аналізі статистичних даних про потреби населення, демографічних показниках регіону.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
20 %
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Economic analysis of the heating station Zhornivka.docx
30.10.2025
09:11:47 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Major repairs of a non-residential building with the installation of a heating point at the address: village of Zhornivka, Ozernyi lane, 4A

Technical Solution 2

Temporary arrangement of mobile heating points

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)6'350'000 UAH550'000 UAH
For preparation350'000 UAH50'000 UAH
For implementation6'000'000 UAH500'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost185'246 UAH30'000 UAH
For operation150'000 UAH10'000 UAH
For closing35'246 UAH20'000 UAH
Average annual costs150'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.11 months2 months
Deadline for developing a FFS3 months1 month
Implementation period8 months1 month
Service life180 months60 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
0
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget6'535'246 UAH580'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)6'350'000 UAH550'000 UAH
For preparation350'000 UAH50'000 UAH
For implementation6'000'000 UAH500'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost185'246 UAH30'000 UAH
For operation150'000 UAH10'000 UAH
For closing35'246 UAH20'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service UnitЗагальні витрати: 350 000 + 6 000 000 + 150 000 + 35 246 = 6 535 246 грн. Ділимо на 1000 осіб:Отже, середня вартість послуги на одного отримувача становить приблизно 6 535 грн з ПДВ. Така сума відображає комплексні витрати на підготовку, реалізацію, експлуатацію та закриття проєкту, забезпечуючи високу якість обігріву для кожного користувача. Врахування 1000 осіб як ємність пункту обігріву допомагає реалістично оцінити вартість за одиницю послуги
Service Unit Cost6'535 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - economic analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - communication with stakeholders

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - risk management

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - social and gender analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - public consultations

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - legal support

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - demand analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - environmental expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of the market environment

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
11/11/2025SP-L-111125-1CC144F5Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeStrategic fit confirmed.-
17/11/2025SPP-L-171125-F79DD607Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeStrategic fit confirmed72