New construction of the shelter of the municipal institution of the Lviv Regional Council "Lviv Lyceum with Enhanced Military and Physical Training named after Heroes Krut"
Sector
Education and science
Stream
Modernization of military (military-sports) lyceums, lyceums with enhanced military-physical training
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Regional level of SP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
To ensure the safety of participants in the educational process, taking into account the 24-hour stay of lyceum students.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Creation of new facilities and services
Secondary Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
Ensuring the safety of participants in the educational process.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The safety of participants in the educational process will be ensured.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of people who will use the service
600 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Education and science
Subsector
School education
Stream
Modernization of military (military-sports) lyceums, lyceums with enhanced military-physical training
Strategic document
Регіональна стратегія розвитку
Task
2.3.1. Improving the quality and territorial accessibility of educational services
Project objectives
Indicator
Base value
Target value
Ensuring the safety of the educational process
1 units
1 units
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?
Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
None of the options are applicable
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
None of the options are applicable
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?
None of the options are applicable
Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?
None of the options are applicable
Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?
None of the options are applicable
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
New construction of the shelter of the municipal institution of the Lviv Regional Council "Lviv Lyceum with Enhanced Military and Physical Training named after Heroes Krut"
Technical Solution 2
Use of city infrastructure
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)68'099'391 UAH2 UAH
For preparation2'093'000 UAH1 UAH
For implementation66'006'391 UAH1 UAH
Project operation and closure cost875'000 UAH2 UAH
For operation875'000 UAH1 UAH
For closing0 UAH1 UAH
Average annual costs1'519'968 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.13 months24 months
Deadline for developing a FFS1 month12 months
Implementation period12 months12 months
Service life600 months180 months
Target indicatorsDefined Not defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Pending
[The project initiator has not taken any decision about this alternative technical approach.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Для реалізації проєкту обрано комбіновану стратегію: «Відкриті торги з особливостями» на платформі Prozorro у поєднанні з моделлю традиційного послідовного проєктування та будівництва (Design-Bid-Build) й умовою твердої договірної ціни.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Для забезпечення прозорості, високої конкуренції та фінансової ефективності під час будівництва укриття для ліцею імені Героїв Крут замовник та контролюючі органи впровадили суворий комплекс підходів. Ці заходи стали реакцією на ризики, виявлені під час перших етапів проєкту (зокрема спроби підрядників штучно завищити ціни на матеріали).
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Competitive dialogue
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Open competitive bidding
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Other
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Direct negotiation procedures
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pre-market engagement
Підхід до попереднього залучення ринку (Early Market Engagement) для цього об'єкта було адаптовано під жорсткі антикорупційні вимоги міжнародних донорів (програма Ukraine Facility) та вимоги Статті 4 Закону України «Про публічні закупівлі
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Potential market participants
Оскільки об'єкт будівництва класифікується за класом наслідків СС2 (середні наслідки), коло учасників чітко обмежене ліцензійними та кваліфікаційними бар'єрами
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Market readiness assessment
Для проєкту Львівського ліцею імені Героїв Крут аналіз ринку продемонстрував високий рівень готовності підрядників до виконання робіт, проте виявив певні ризики у сфері ціноутворення та прозорості.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget68'974'391 UAH4 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)68'099'391 UAH2 UAH
For preparation2'093'000 UAH1 UAH
For implementation66'006'391 UAH1 UAH
Project operation and closure cost875'000 UAH2 UAH
For operation875'000 UAH1 UAH
For closing0 UAH1 UAH
Чи була під час уточнення орієнтовного бюджету використана Методика розрахунку вартості публічного інвестиційного проєкту, затверджена наказом Міністерства фінансів України №316 від 23.06.2025 р.?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Чи була під час розрахунку орієнтовного бюджету використана Методика розрахунку вартості публічного інвестиційного проєкту, затверджена наказом Міністерства фінансів України №316 від 23.06.2025 р.?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service Unitгрн
Service Unit Cost1'519'968 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial analysis - financial analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - risk management
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - communication with stakeholders
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - public consultations
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - environmental expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of the market environment
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - legal support
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
No, this is the first project of its kind.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
None of the options are applicable
Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Organizational events
ResponseDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
15/05/2026SP-R-150526-6D0E090CRegional SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
19/05/2026SPP-R-190526-E5C169A8Regional SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyNot approvedThe project is duplicated.-