New construction of a civil defense protective structure on the territory of Bereznehuvaty preschool educational institution No. 1 "Sonechko"
Sector
Education and science
Stream
Modernization of the educational environment and material and technical base of community preschool educational institutions
Maturity level
79
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The new construction of a civil defense protective structure on the territory of Bereznehuvaty preschool educational institution No. 1 "Sonechko" is being carried out in order to organize protection with the possibility of sheltering 100% of participants in the educational process and other employees of the preschool educational institution.
The purpose of the project
Main goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards
Secondary goal:
Creation of new facilities and services, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions, Improving the quality of services
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
The project involves the construction of a new shelter that will fully comply with current civil defense standards, construction, fire protection, sanitary and hygienic and environmental requirements. Currently, the Bereznehuvat preschool educational institution No. 1 "Sonechko" does not have a civil defense protective structure (CPS), it is planned to build an anti-radiation shelter.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
Relevance: the problem is especially relevant in the conditions of martial law in Ukraine, frequent air raids and rocket attacks, when children belong to the most vulnerable category of the population.
Ensuring safety in educational institutions is one of the priorities of state policy in the field of civil defense, educational development and childhood protection.
In addition, the presence of shelter is a prerequisite for the functioning of a modern kindergarten - without it it is impossible to fully organize the educational process, which limits children's access to preschool education and creates social tension among parents.
If the problem is not resolved, there are risks to the lives of children and employees of the institution in the event of emergencies, suspension of the institution due to non-compliance with safety standards.
Positive changes: increasing the level of security, improving community infrastructure, ensuring a continuous educational process.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of employees of the institution/institution/organization
36 human
Number of people who will use the service
151 human
Capacity
160 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Education and science
Subsector
Preschool education
Stream
Modernization of the educational environment and material and technical base of community preschool educational institutions
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
2.1.1 Ensure the quality, accessibility, safety, and inclusiveness of educational services and improve the material and technical base of educational institutions
Project objectives
Project objectives were not specified by the initiator
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?
Yes, it was conducted
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
None of the options are applicable
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
None of the options are applicable
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?
None of the options are applicable
Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?
None of the options are applicable
Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?
Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
New construction of a civil defense protective structure on the territory of Bereznehuvaty preschool educational institution No. 1 "Sonechko"
Technical Solution 2
Installation of a modular shelter on the territory of Bereznehuvaty preschool educational institution No. 1 "Sonechko"
Total costs56'427'376 UAH2'300'003 UAH
Average annual costs344'960 UAH170'000 UAH
Project duration, incl.37 months2 months
Service life1200 months360 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Для реалізації проєкту обрано змішану стратегію закупівель, яка поєднує пряму закупівлю основного обладнання у виробника та відкриту конкурентну процедуру для виконання супровідних робіт (монтаж, підключення, облаштування території). Такий підхід забезпечує оптимальне співвідношення вартості, якості та строків виконання робіт.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
ProZorro
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Direct negotiation procedures
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pre-market engagement
На основі зібраних даних було сформовано технічне завдання, графік реалізації та кошторисну частину проєкту.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Potential market participants
Проведене попереднє залучення ринку та консультації дозволили визначити реальний рівень цін, уточнити технічні вимоги, а також сформувати обґрунтований підхід до вибору процедури закупівлі. Очікується, що завдяки наявності кількох досвідчених виробників та підрядників конкуренція буде достатньою для забезпечення ефективного використання коштів і якісного виконання проєкту.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Market readiness assessment
Ринок України підготовлений до реалізації проєкту з будівництва ПРУ, проте потребує залучення досвідчених підрядників, що вже реалізовували подібні об’єкти.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget56'427'376 UAH2'300'003 UAH
Capital costs56'427'376 UAH2'300'003 UAH
Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH
Preliminary cost breakdown
Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
For preparation1 UAH1 UAH
For implementation56'427'373 UAH2'300'000 UAH
For operation1 UAH1 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitСередня вартість проєкту на одного отримувача послуги
Service Unit Cost373'691 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
None of the options are applicable
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Partially, we have limited experience
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
None of the options are applicable
Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Organizational events
ResponseDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
15/10/2025SP-L-151025-6B28990CCommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeDraft decision - to include in the sectoral portfolio.-
20/01/2026SP-N-200126-08FA1214State SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
28/10/2025SPP-L-281025-3ACD2E7ACommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-79