New construction of a dual purpose building with the protective properties of an anti-radiation shelter SMILIAN CHILDREN'S BOARDING HOME at the address: Cherkasy Region, Cherkasy District, Smila, St. Osavula Vasyla Burka, 4.
Sector
Social sector
Stream
Development and modernization of protective structures of social infrastructure facilities
Maturity level
81
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Regional level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
A dual-purpose building with protective properties of an anti-radiation shelter will provide an opportunity to better protect pupils/wards and employees, including those who work around the clock during air alarms in connection with armed aggression. Also, after the end of the armed aggression, the dual purpose building can be used as workshops or rehabilitation rooms for pupils/wards with special needs.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Creation of new facilities and services
Secondary Goal:
Creation of new facilities and services, Improving the condition of infrastructure
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
To ensure the protection of people's lives from dangerous factors, such as (war) and in peacetime - from the consequences of emergency situations (accidents, disasters, natural disasters) by creating a dual-purpose structure with the protective properties of an anti-radiation shelter
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
Building a shelter solves the main problem of today - ensuring the safety and survival of people during military threats (shelling, missile attacks), natural disasters and other emergencies.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Maintenance costs per year
50 thous. UAH
Number of users from low-mobility population groups
55 human
Number of people who will use the service
325 human
Number of employees of the institution/institution/organization
145 human
Number of IDP users
24 human
Population in the geographical area of influence of the project
65675 human
Number of IDPs in the geographical area of impact of the project
6853 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Social sector
Subsector
Social services
Stream
Development and modernization of protective structures of social infrastructure facilities
Strategic document
Регіональна стратегія розвитку
Task
3.3.3 Development and modernization of social infrastructure
Project objectives
Indicator
Base value
Target value
Continuity of the institution's functioning
1 units
1 units
Protection from means of injury for wards, institution employees and residents living nearby
325 human
500 human
Creating comfortable conditions (in the long term)
1 units
1 units
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
Poll
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
100 %
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?
Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
None of the options are applicable
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?
No consultations were held with target groups.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Women's participation is ensured at various stages of planning (including public hearings)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?
All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The percentage of women who could be resettled has been quantified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
All possible negative impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?
None of the options are applicable
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
New construction of a dual purpose building with the protective properties of an anti-radiation shelter SMILIAN CHILDREN'S BOARDING HOME at the address: Cherkasy Region, Cherkasy District, Smila, St. Osavula Vasyla Burka, 4.
Technical Solution 2
External water supply and sewage networks
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)74'243'627 UAH850'709 UAH
For preparation1'685'226 UAH106'338 UAH
For implementation72'558'401 UAH744'371 UAH
Project operation and closure cost3'765'471 UAH632'676 UAH
For operation337'209 UAH420'000 UAH
For closing3'428'262 UAH212'676 UAH
Average annual costs50 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.27 months25 months
Deadline for developing a FFS3 months1 month
Implementation period24 months24 months
Service life600 months600 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Tender
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
ProZorro
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pre-market engagement
аналіз аналогічних проєктів, консультації з експертами
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Potential market participants
Analysis not performed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Market readiness assessment
Наявні кваліфіковані виконавці, необмежені технології та ресурси
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget78'009'098 UAH1'483'385 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)74'243'627 UAH850'709 UAH
For preparation1'685'226 UAH106'338 UAH
For implementation72'558'401 UAH744'371 UAH
Project operation and closure cost3'765'471 UAH632'676 UAH
For operation337'209 UAH420'000 UAH
For closing3'428'262 UAH212'676 UAH
Чи була під час уточнення орієнтовного бюджету використана Методика розрахунку вартості публічного інвестиційного проєкту, затверджена наказом Міністерства фінансів України №316 від 23.06.2025 р.?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Чи була під час розрахунку орієнтовного бюджету використана Методика розрахунку вартості публічного інвестиційного проєкту, затверджена наказом Міністерства фінансів України №316 від 23.06.2025 р.?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitСередня вартість проєкту на одного отримувача послугиимувача послуг
Service Unit Cost240'028 UAH1'253 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - communication with stakeholders
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - risk management
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - legal support
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial analysis - financial analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Yes, negotiations are already underway.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Financial consultants/modelers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Legal consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Commercial experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Technical experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management experts / project managers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Organizational events
ResponseDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
15/12/2025SP-R-151225-BDAE1CEDRegional SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeThe project meets the requirements-
23/12/2025SPP-R-231225-D8D364D4Regional SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-81