Construction of a protective civil defense structure on the territory of Cherkasy Comprehensive School of I-III Grades No. 21 named after Yu.G. Illenko of the Cherkasy City Council of the Cherkasy Region at 82 Nyzhnia Horova St. in the city of Cherkasy


Sector
Education and science
Stream
Arrangement of civil defense protective structures (shelters) in preschool educational institutions and ensuring their accessibility for all participants in the educational process
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The Customer's investment intentions and plans provide for the construction of a new civil defense protective structure for 150 people to ensure the protection and safety of students and staff of Cherkasy Secondary School of Grades I-III No. 21 from weapons of mass destruction and emergencies during martial law and in peacetime.

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Meeting demand

Secondary goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions, Improving the quality of services, Reducing territorial or social gaps

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

ensuring the safety, protection of life and health of students and staff during air raids, allowing for the resumption of in-person learning.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The project provides for the construction of a protective civil defense structure on the territory of Cherkasy comprehensive school of grades I-III No. 21 named after Yu.G. Illenko of the Cherkasy city council of the Cherkasy region at 82 Nyzhnia Horova Street, in the city of Cherkasy

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of IDPs in the geographical area of impact of the project

30 thous. people

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

Preschool education

Stream

Arrangement of civil defense protective structures (shelters) in preschool educational institutions and ensuring their accessibility for all participants in the educational process

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

Priority 3: Comfortable, efficient and smart city Development and modernization of urban infrastructure

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

якісні (опитування, фокус-групи, експертні оцінки) та кількісні (статистичний аналіз, екстраполяція тенденцій, економетричні моделі) методи
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
5000 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Envisaged training or advanced training for women in the private sector
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Detailed calculation of estimated financial need.docx
12.02.2026
13:45:07 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Construction of a civil defense structure

Technical Solution 2

Capital repair of the premises

Total costs25'655'583 UAH6'500'000 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 800'000 UAH500'000 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 23'855'583 UAH5'000'000 UAH
  • For operation
  • 500'000 UAH500'000 UAH
  • For closing
  • 500'000 UAH500'000 UAH
    Average annual costs500'000 UAH500'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.36 months18 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 12 months6 months
  • Implementation period
  • 24 months12 months
    Service life1200 months840 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Rejected

    [The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    0
    To components
    0

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, both national and international

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget25'655'583 UAH6'500'000 UAH
    Capital costs25'655'583 UAH6'500'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation800'000 UAH500'000 UAH
    For implementation23'855'583 UAH5'000'000 UAH
    For operation500'000 UAH500'000 UAH
    For closing500'000 UAH500'000 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitСередня вартість проєкту на одного отримувача послуги
    Service Unit Cost45'612 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    No – analysis not performed

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    No, no assessment was conducted.

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable

    Project Approval History

    DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasons
    12/02/2026SP-L-120226-BAD5659ECommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-
    02/03/2026SPP-L-020326-E6265C76Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-