Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
Equipping preschool institutions with metal detectors is aimed at increasing the level of safety for children and staff. Installing such devices makes it possible to prevent dangerous objects from being brought into the institution, respond to potential threats in a timely manner, and strengthen the access control system. This solution creates a more secure educational environment in which parents can be confident in the safety of their children.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
The project is aimed at creating a protected educational environment that minimizes the risks of dangerous objects entering the premises, increases the speed of response to potential threats, and ensures the physical and psychological comfort of children, employees, and parents. The project involves strengthening the institution's security system through technical, organizational, and preventive measures. This will increase the level of staff readiness for emergency situations and contribute to the formation of a safe environment in accordance with modern standards and state requirements for the protection of educational institutions.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
Problems
Lack of effective access control and the ability to detect dangerous objects. Risks to the safety of children and staff due to outdated or missing security systems. Reduced parental trust and increased anxiety due to insufficient protection.
Results after project implementation.
Controlled entry to the institution and prevention of carrying dangerous objects were ensured. The level of safety of children, employees and visitors was increased. Parental trust increased, the general psychological climate in the institution improved.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of people who will use the service
486 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Education and science
Subsector
Preschool education
Stream
Ensuring safe conditions in preschool education institutions
Strategic document
Concept of Educational Institution Safety
Task
Ensuring the security of educational institutions in accordance with the established procedure with the involvement of security police, installing an alarm system in educational institutions with connection to centralized surveillance and response points, installing stationary metal detectors, installing the necessary fences and implementing other infrastructure measures to organize the security of educational institutions
Project objectives
Project objectives were not specified by the initiator
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
аналіз вимог щодо безпеки закладів освіти
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
25
45 human
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
None of the options are applicable
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
None of the options are applicable
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Equipping preschool educational institutions with metal detectors
Technical Solution 2
Hybrid system "Smart Security" (Soft Security)
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)1'540'000 UAH200'000 UAH
For preparation10'000 UAH100'000 UAH
For implementation1'530'000 UAH100'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost20'000 UAH200'000 UAH
For operation10'000 UAH100'000 UAH
For closing10'000 UAH100'000 UAH
Average annual costs1'560'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.48 months72 months
Deadline for developing a FFS12 months36 months
Implementation period36 months36 months
Service life120 months180 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget1'560'000 UAH400'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)1'540'000 UAH200'000 UAH
For preparation10'000 UAH100'000 UAH
For implementation1'530'000 UAH100'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost20'000 UAH200'000 UAH
For operation10'000 UAH100'000 UAH
For closing10'000 UAH100'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service Unitшт
Service Unit Cost260'000 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
20/02/2026SP-L-200226-F3C15419Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
24/02/2026SPP-L-240226-0749DC20Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-80