Reconstruction of the “Kryzhanivskyi Lyceum” Building of the Fontanska Village Council, Odesa District, Odesa Region, with the Installation of Civil Protection Facilities at: 1 Shkilnyi Lane, Kryzhanivka Village, Odesa Region. Construction Phases I–II (adjusted design)
Sector
Education and science
Stream
Ensuring access to quality general secondary education through the modernization of the institution and the provision of civil protection shelters (basic shelter
Maturity level
86
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The project provides for the comprehensive reconstruction of the “Kryzhanivskyi Lyceum” building, including the modernization of interior spaces, engineering networks, and façade solutions. Special attention is given to the installation of civil protection facilities to ensure safe conditions for all participants in the educational process. The works will be carried out within Construction Phases I–II and aim to enhance the functionality, energy efficiency, and overall resilience of the educational institution.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Improving the condition of infrastructure
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
The goal of the project is to create a safe, modern and sustainable educational environment through a comprehensive reconstruction of the lyceum building and the arrangement of civil defense facilities that will comply with current state building codes and security requirements in conditions of military risks. The project is aimed at ensuring a continuous educational process, improving the living conditions of students and employees, and increasing the energy efficiency and durability of the building.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The existing lyceum building has significant physical and moral wear and tear. Structural elements, individual components and enclosing structures have lost some of their operational properties. The facade needs repair and insulation, the roof has damage that leads to leaks and heat loss. The materials used during the old construction do not meet modern energy efficiency and safety requirements.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of people who will use the service
782 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Education and science
Subsector
School education
Stream
Ensuring access to quality general secondary education through the modernization of the institution and the provision of civil protection shelters (basic shelter
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
3.4.2 Create safe and modern learning conditions in educational institutions
Project objectives
Indicator
Base value
Target value
Share of new civil defense structures (shelters) in schools
80 %
100 %
Number of modernized general secondary education institutions
4 units
5 units
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
Poll
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
782 human
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?
Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?
None of the options are applicable
Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?
None of the options are applicable
Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?
None of the options are applicable
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Number of modernized general secondary education institutions
Technical Solution 2
Modular shelter instead of stationary
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)98'228'634 UAH9'400'000 UAH
For preparation348'000 UAH400'000 UAH
For implementation97'880'634 UAH9'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost2'000'000 UAH150'000 UAH
For operation2'000'000 UAH150'000 UAH
Average annual costs32'742'878 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.48 months4 months
Deadline for developing a FFS12 months2 months
Implementation period36 months2 months
Service life900 months120 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Обрано стратегію відкритих торгів із закупівлею робіт «під ключ» через Prozorro, що відповідає ринку, забезпечує конкуренцію, оптимальні строки, якість виконання та ефективне використання бюджетних коштів.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Прозорість, конкуренція та ефективність закупівель забезпечуються через Prozorro, відкриті торги, недискримінаційні вимоги, публічність рішень, поетапну оплату та зовнішній контроль.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pre-market engagement
Отримана в ході попереднього залучення ринку інформація дала змогу реалістично сформувати технічні рішення, кошторисну вартість проєкту, обрати доцільну стратегію закупівель і забезпечити відповідність проєкту реальним умовам ринку.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Potential market participants
Потенційні учасники ринку — будівельні та проєктні компанії, постачальники матеріалів і обладнання, підприємства з благоустрою, малі та середні підприємства.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Market readiness assessment
Ринок є достатньо готовим: наявні підрядники, постачальники, трудові ресурси та підтверджений досвід реалізації аналогічних проєктів.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget100'228'634 UAH9'550'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)98'228'634 UAH9'400'000 UAH
For preparation348'000 UAH400'000 UAH
For implementation97'880'634 UAH9'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost2'000'000 UAH150'000 UAH
For operation2'000'000 UAH150'000 UAH
For closing0 UAH0 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service Unit782 учня
Service Unit Cost125'612 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
No – analysis not performed
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds41'104'435 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds98'228'634 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - communication with stakeholders
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - risk management
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - public consultations
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - legal support
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial analysis - financial analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - environmental expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of the market environment
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
No, this is the first project of its kind.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
No, I need help.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Environmental experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Legal consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Technical experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management experts / project managers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Economic riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
12/12/2025SP-L-121225-C4068D8DCommunity SPPreliminary Investment Feasibility StudyInclude--
16/12/2025SP-L-161225-E6E6AE8BCommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
20/01/2026SP-N-200126-0F3EF772State SPInvestment Feasibility StudyCancellation of the decision to include in a joint venture--
21/01/2026SP-N-210126-8E3F8BD6State SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
22/12/2025SPP-L-221225-22B2DF5DCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-86