Reconstruction of the off-site water supply system of the city of Lozova, Kharkiv region, water mains D=600-1000mm, L1=33.128 km and L2=32.785 km. inventory No. 44055, 44056, 44057 and with an internal site pipeline
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Reconstruction, major repairs, new construction, restoration, development, modernization (including supply of equipment and materials) of facilities and networks of centralized water supply and wastewater disposal in Kharkiv, including with the introduction of alternative energy sources
Maturity level
84
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
There are two existing main pipelines D=600-1000mm long L=33.128 and L=32.785km, pipe material – steel, reinforced concrete. The geographical difference in elevation between the bottom of the water main in Lozova at PK0 and the maximum water level in the RFV of Lozova is 56.7m. The average water consumption for 2024 is 4788 m/day. There are 4 branches on the water mains for connecting existing subscribers: Subscriber of the KP "Teplovodoservis" of the Lozova City Council (average daily consumption - 560.5 m/day): PK0+85 branch Ду=100mm nas.Elizavetivka PK 24 branch Ду=250mmna s-shche. Krasnopavlivka Subscriber "Lozovavodoservis" of the Lozova City Council (average daily consumption - 4227.5 m/day): PK250+13 branches DN=200mm, Lymanivka PK331+55 DN=700mm, entrance to the Lozova RFV
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Improving the quality of services
Secondary Goal:
Improving the condition of infrastructure
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
Technical wear, improvement of service quality, improvement of water quality, reduction of operating costs
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of people who will use the service
100 thous. people
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Subsector
Water supply and sanitation
Stream
Reconstruction, major repairs, new construction, restoration, development, modernization (including supply of equipment and materials) of facilities and networks of centralized water supply and wastewater disposal in Kharkiv, including with the introduction of alternative energy sources
Strategic document
Регіональна стратегія розвитку
Task
14 Availability of quality centralized water supply and wastewater services for different groups of citizens, taking into account the latest technologies and the needs of territorial communities.
Project objectives
Indicator
Base value
Target value
Reconstruction of water pipes
2 units
2 units
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?
Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
None of the options are applicable
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?
None of the options are applicable
Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?
None of the options are applicable
Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?
None of the options are applicable
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Reconstruction of the off-site water supply system of the city of Lozova, Kharkiv region, water mains D=600-1000mm, L1=33.128 km and L2=32.785 km. inventory No. 44055, 44056, 44057 and with an on-site pipeline
Technical Solution 2
Not provided
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)299'600'000 UAH2 UAH
For preparation19'600'000 UAH1 UAH
For implementation280'000'000 UAH1 UAH
Project operation and closure cost12'600'000 UAH2 UAH
For operation8'400'000 UAH1 UAH
For closing4'200'000 UAH1 UAH
Average annual costs16'800'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.18 months18 months
Deadline for developing a FFS6 months6 months
Implementation period12 months12 months
Service life600 months600 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
відкриту та без бар"єрну
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Prozorro та інші майданчики для пудлічних закупівель
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Competitive dialogue
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Direct negotiation procedures
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pre-market engagement
ні не проводилось
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Potential market participants
ні не проводилось
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Market readiness assessment
Український та міжнародний ринок готовий для реалізації проекту
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget312'200'000 UAH4 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)299'600'000 UAH2 UAH
For preparation19'600'000 UAH1 UAH
For implementation280'000'000 UAH1 UAH
Project operation and closure cost12'600'000 UAH2 UAH
For operation8'400'000 UAH1 UAH
For closing4'200'000 UAH1 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitСередня вартість проєкту на одного отримувача послуги
Service Unit Cost2'800 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
No – analysis not performed
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
12/10/2025SP-L-121025-930B1E29Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
12/12/2025SPP-L-121225-E871073FCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-84