New construction of a pipeline for the discharge of mine water from the Svystunov beam in connection with the need to eliminate the negative consequences associated with the destruction of the Kakhovka hydroelectric power station, Dnipropetrovsk region
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Restoration, development and modernization of centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources
Maturity level
65
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
New construction of a pipeline for the discharge of mine water from the Svystunov beam in connection with the need to eliminate the negative consequences associated with the destruction of the Kakhovka hydroelectric power station, Dnipropetrovsk region
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Contribution to climate or environmental goals
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
Elimination of negative consequences associated with the destruction of the Kakhovka hydroelectric power station by relocating the discharge point of highly mineralized mine waters
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The implementation of the project is directly related to the implementation of the project for the construction of main water pipelines in connection with the need to eliminate the negative consequences associated with the destruction of the Kakhovka hydroelectric power station, and is aimed at ensuring uninterrupted water supply to residents of the cities of Kryvyi Rih, Apostolovo and the Zelenodolsk community.
The reservoir pond is designed for temporary accumulation of mine waters with subsequent discharge into the Inhulets River.
The accumulated mine waters in the Svystunov basin negatively affect the water quality in the Inhulets River and the overall ecological situation of the basin.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of people who will use the service
650 thous. people
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Subsector
Water supply and sanitation
Stream
Restoration, development and modernization of centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources
Strategic document
State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021–2027
Task
Task 14 under the “Comfortable Communities” area of Operational Objective 1. Infrastructure resilient to security, social and economic challenges Availability of quality centralized water supply and wastewater services for different groups of citizens, taking into account the latest technologies and the needs of territorial communities
Project objectives
Project objectives were not specified by the initiator
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?
Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
None of the options are applicable
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
None of the options are applicable
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?
None of the options are applicable
Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?
None of the options are applicable
Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?
None of the options are applicable
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
New construction of a pipeline for the discharge of mine water from the Svystunov beam in connection with the need to eliminate the negative consequences associated with the destruction of the Kakhovka hydroelectric power station, Dnipropetrovsk region
Technical Solution 2
Transfer of mine water discharge below the water intake of the Ingulets River water pipeline - Southern Reservoir (gravity system)
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)448'780'045 UAH718'493'569 UAH
For preparation4'448'200 UAH7'113'798 UAH
For implementation444'331'845 UAH711'379'771 UAH
Project operation and closure cost73'314'754 UAH117'377'663 UAH
For operation6'664'978 UAH10'670'697 UAH
For closing66'649'776 UAH106'706'966 UAH
Average annual costs6'732'301 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.15 months24 months
Deadline for developing a FFS6 months9 months
Implementation period9 months15 months
Service life360 months360 months
Target indicatorsDefined Not defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Pending
[The project initiator has not taken any decision about this alternative technical approach.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Відповідно до підпункту 4 пункту 13 постанови КМУ від 12.10.2022 № 1178 обрано прямий договір
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
ProZorro
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Direct negotiation procedures
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pre-market engagement
Використовували прямі запити до компаній та аналіз аналогічних договорів
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Potential market participants
Відповідно до аналізу комерційних пропозицій досвіду з аналогічних договорів
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Market readiness assessment
На теперішній час є дуже обмеженим
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget522'094'799 UAH835'871'232 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)448'780'045 UAH718'493'569 UAH
For preparation4'448'200 UAH7'113'798 UAH
For implementation444'331'845 UAH711'379'771 UAH
Project operation and closure cost73'314'754 UAH117'377'663 UAH
For operation6'664'978 UAH10'670'697 UAH
For closing66'649'776 UAH106'706'966 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service Unitлюдина
Service Unit Cost690 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
No – analysis not performed
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - legal support
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Economic justification - environmental expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Yes, negotiations are already underway.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Technical experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Social riskDefinedUndefined
Environmental riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
15/08/2025SP-N-150825-C6F2CB55State SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
01/10/2025SPP-N-011025-4CD0DCD1State SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-65