New construction of a pipeline for the discharge of mine water from the Svystunov beam in connection with the need to eliminate the negative consequences associated with the destruction of the Kakhovka hydroelectric power station, Dnipropetrovsk region
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Restoration, development and modernization of centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- Preparation
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
General information
Description of the project
New construction of a pipeline for the discharge of mine water from the Svystunov beam in connection with the need to eliminate the negative consequences associated with the destruction of the Kakhovka hydroelectric power station, Dnipropetrovsk region
The purpose of the project
Main goal:
Contribution to climate or environmental goals
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
Elimination of negative consequences associated with the destruction of the Kakhovka hydroelectric power station by relocating the discharge point of highly mineralized mine waters
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The implementation of the project is directly related to the implementation of the project for the construction of main water pipelines in connection with the need to eliminate the negative consequences associated with the destruction of the Kakhovka hydroelectric power station, and is aimed at ensuring uninterrupted water supply to residents of the cities of Kryvyi Rih, Apostolovo and the Zelenodolsk community.
The reservoir pond is designed for temporary accumulation of mine waters with subsequent discharge into the Inhulets River.
The accumulated mine waters in the Svystunov basin negatively affect the water quality in the Inhulets River and the overall ecological situation of the basin.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of people who will use the service
650 thous. people
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Subsector
Water supply and sanitation
Stream
Restoration, development and modernization of centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources
Strategic document
State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021–2027
Task
Task 14 under the “Comfortable Communities” area of Operational Objective 1. Infrastructure resilient to security, social and economic challenges Availability of quality centralized water supply and wastewater services for different groups of citizens, taking into account the latest technologies and the needs of territorial communities
Project objectives
Project objectives were not specified by the initiator
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?
Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Відповідно до ПОСТАНОВИ КМУ від 6 червня 2023 р. № 566 Про виділення коштів з фонду ліквідації наслідків збройної агресії для реалізації експериментального проекту з будівництва магістральних водогонів у зв’язку з необхідністю ліквідації негативних наслідків, пов’язаних із знищенням Каховської гідроелектростанції
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
The project may result in the forced displacement of women, men and other gender groups or loss of access to resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Other gender risks
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
There are risks of impaired mobility or safety for women, men and other gender groups during construction/operation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
There is a risk of reduced economic opportunities for women, men and other gender groups (e.g. loss of jobs or retail outlets)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Other benefits from project implementation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Envisaged training or advanced training for women in the private sector
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?
Focus groups or consultations with women and vulnerable groups were held
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Feedback on the project design was received from organizations working with women
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
No consultations were held with target groups.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Women's participation is ensured at various stages of planning (including public hearings)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?
All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
A plan to mitigate negative social impacts focused on women has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The percentage of women who could be resettled has been quantified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The percentage of women who may lose or gain access to resources (water, food, healthcare) is quantified.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The percentage of women who will gain new educational/professional opportunities is quantified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
All possible negative impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?
A policy/code of conduct on non-discrimination and gender equality has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
A gender specialist/advisor is included in the project management structure
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Mandatory training for project staff on gender equality and inclusion is provided
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
New construction of a pipeline for the discharge of mine water from the Svystunov beam in connection with the need to eliminate the negative consequences associated with the destruction of the Kakhovka hydroelectric power station, Dnipropetrovsk region
Technical Solution 2
Transfer of mine water discharge below the water intake of the Ingulets River water pipeline - Southern Reservoir (gravity system)
Total costs522'094'799 UAH835'871'232 UAH
Average annual costs6'732'301 UAH10'670'697 UAH
Project duration, incl.15 months24 months
Service life360 months360 months
Target indicatorsDefined Not defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Pending
[The project initiator has not taken any decision about this alternative technical approach.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Відповідно до підпункту 4 пункту 13 постанови КМУ від 12.10.2022 № 1178 обрано прямий договір
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
ProZorro
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Other
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Competitive dialogue
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Direct negotiation procedures
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Відповідно до підпункту 4 пункту 13 постанови КМУ від 12.10.2022 № 1178 - нагальна потреба
Pre-market engagement
Використовували прямі запити до компаній та аналіз аналогічних договорів
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Potential market participants
Відповідно до аналізу комерційних пропозицій досвіду з аналогічних договорів
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Market readiness assessment
На теперішній час є дуже обмеженим
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget522'094'799 UAH835'871'232 UAH
Capital costs522'094'799 UAH835'871'232 UAH
Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH
Preliminary cost breakdown
Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
For preparation4'448'200 UAH7'113'798 UAH
For implementation444'331'845 UAH711'379'771 UAH
For operation6'664'978 UAH10'670'697 UAH
For closing66'649'776 UAH106'706'966 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service Unitлюдина
Service Unit Cost690 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?
ResponseNoNo
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
No – analysis not performed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - communication with stakeholders
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - risk management
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - public consultations
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - legal support
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial analysis - financial analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - environmental expertise
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of the market environment
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic justification - forming a justification for the problem and need
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management rationale - public consultation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of the market environment
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - environmental expertise
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Необхідно для визначення загальної кошторисної вартості проекту
Management rationale - project management
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management rationale - communication with stakeholders
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Необхідно для визначення загальної кошторисної вартості проекту
Management justification - other
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial analysis - financial analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management rationale - risk management
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management rationale - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management justification - legal support
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Yes, negotiations are already underway.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Specialists in interaction with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Environmental experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Others
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial consultants/modelers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Legal consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Commercial experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic analysts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Technical experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Social/gender consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management experts / project managers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Social riskDefinedUndefined
Environmental riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
Development of a full feasibility study;
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Development of design and estimate documentation (DED);
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Other
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
Other
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]