Major renovation of the Dining Room and Catering Unit of the "Myrhorod Lyceum No. 1 named after Panas Myrny of the Myrhorod City Council, Poltava Region" at the address: 173/2 Gogolya St. in the city of Myrhorod, Poltava Region
Sector
Education and science
Stream
Ensuring access to high-quality and safe food in educational institutions through the development of modern canteen infrastructure (food blocks)
Maturity level
83
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The implementation of the project will allow: - to provide appropriate conditions for organizing high-quality and safe nutrition for students; - to reduce operating costs by modernizing engineering networks and energy-efficient solutions; - to increase the level of sanitary safety and compliance with state standards; - to create a modern catering unit that meets the requirements of organizing school meals.
The purpose of the project
Main goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards
Secondary goal:
Improving the quality of services
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
Interior and equipment updates
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
Outdated equipment, worn out materials.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of people who will use the service
850 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Education and science
Subsector
School education
Stream
Ensuring access to high-quality and safe food in educational institutions through the development of modern canteen infrastructure (food blocks)
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
A.3.2.2 Creating a modern safe educational environment in educational institutions of the territorial community
Project objectives
Project objectives were not specified by the initiator
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
None of the options are applicable
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
None of the options are applicable
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Major renovation of the Dining Room and Catering Unit of the "Myrhorod Lyceum No. 1 named after Panas Myrny of the Myrhorod City Council, Poltava Region" at the address: 173/2 Gogolya St. in the city of Myrhorod, Poltava Region
Technical Solution 2
Carrying out partial (current) repairs to the dining room and catering unit without comprehensive modernization of engineering networks and technological equipment
Total costs15'000'000 UAH4'000'000 UAH
Average annual costs30'000 UAH600'000 UAH
Project duration, incl.27 months13 months
Service life240 months60 months
Target indicatorsDefined Not defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Pending
[The project initiator has not taken any decision about this alternative technical approach.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget15'000'000 UAH4'000'000 UAH
Capital costs15'000'000 UAH4'000'000 UAH
Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH
Preliminary cost breakdown
Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
For preparation700'000 UAH120'000 UAH
For implementation13'600'000 UAH3'660'000 UAH
For operation500'000 UAH200'000 UAH
For closing200'000 UAH20'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitОдин учень.
Service Unit Cost30'000 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
No – analysis not performed
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
None of the options are applicable
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
No, this is the first project of its kind.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Other riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
10/03/2026SP-L-100326-CACB750ECommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeRecommended to include in a sectoral portfolio-
11/03/2026SPP-L-110326-DA4EB19FCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeIt is recommended to include the community in a single project portfolio.83