Emergency repair work (overhaul) using a polymer sleeve to restore a 300 mm diameter sewer collector on D. Mazura Street in Kramatorsk, Donetsk region, damaged as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Restoration, development and modernization of centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
Renovation of a sewer collector D 300 mm using the latest technology with a polymer sleeve. Reliable and trouble-free operation of the sewer collector, drainage of wastewater from the residential sector and enterprises, avoidance of soil pollution by wastewater.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Rebuilding the damaged/destroyed
Secondary Goal:
Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
Trouble-free operation of the sewer collector
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The damaged collector will be restored using a polymer sleeve.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Operating expenses per year
100 thous. UAH
Number of people who will use the service
3000 human
Population in the geographical area of influence of the project
7000.01 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Subsector
Water supply and sanitation
Stream
Restoration, development and modernization of centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources
Strategic document
Регіональна стратегія розвитку
Task
3.2.2 Provision of water supply and drainage services
Project objectives
Indicator
Base value
Target value
Restoration of the collector D 300 mm with a length of 529 m
529 m
529 m
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
Технічне обстеження : Визначення фактичного фізичного зносу, наявності засмічень, просідань та руйнувань труб.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
3356693 m3
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Pipe-in-pipe method, application of polymer coatings
Technical Solution 2
Emergency recovery work using horizontal directional drilling
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)18'335'158 UAH24'300'000 UAH
For preparation680'000 UAH900'000 UAH
For implementation17'655'158 UAH23'400'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost90'282 UAH900'000 UAH
For operation90'282 UAH900'000 UAH
Average annual costs0 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.5 months5 months
Deadline for developing a FFS2 months2 months
Implementation period3 months3 months
Service life480 months240 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget18'425'440 UAH25'200'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)18'335'158 UAH24'300'000 UAH
For preparation680'000 UAH900'000 UAH
For implementation17'655'158 UAH23'400'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost90'282 UAH900'000 UAH
For operation90'282 UAH900'000 UAH
For closing0 UAH0 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service Unit6112
Service Unit Cost18'335'158 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
27/03/2026SP-L-270326-88521BC4Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
01/04/2026SPP-L-010426-B35BEA68Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--