Landscaping, reconstruction of a children's playground near the building of the preschool educational institution (nursery-kindergarten) "TOPOLKA" of the Fontanka Village Council of the Odessa district of the Odessa region at the address: Odesa region, Odessa district, Fontanka village, Shkilna st., building 1A
Sector
Education and science
Stream
Modernization of infrastructure and provision of a safe educational environment in preschool institutions
Maturity level
88
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The territory of the preschool educational institution "Topolka" in the village of Fontanka needs renovation. The existing children's playground has worn-out equipment and uneven surface, which creates unsafe conditions for children. The lack of modern amenities negatively affects the level of physical activity and general comfort of pupils.
The project is aimed at improving the conditions for children, providing a safe space for leisure, developing physical activity and creating a positive educational environment.
Improving the conditions for children in the preschool institution by reconstructing the children's playground and improving the surrounding area, taking into account safety and comfort requirements.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards
Secondary Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Improving the quality of services
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
Improving the conditions for children in the preschool by reconstructing the children's playground and improving the surrounding area, taking into account safety and comfort requirements.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The territory of the preschool educational institution "Topolka" in the village of Fontanka needs renovation. The existing children's sports ground has worn-out equipment, uneven surface, which creates unsafe conditions for children. The lack of modern amenities negatively affects the level of physical activity and general comfort of pupils.
The project is aimed at improving the conditions for children, providing a safe space for leisure, developing physical activity and creating a positive educational environment.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Population in the geographical area of influence of the project
8844 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Education and science
Subsector
Preschool education
Stream
Modernization of infrastructure and provision of a safe educational environment in preschool institutions
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
3.4.2. and 3.2.3. Create safe and modern learning conditions in educational institutions; and Create a sports and recreation infrastructure in the community for all segments of the population, in order to promote a healthy lifestyle, provide additional jobs, attract young people, older people and work with veterans. Build creative children's and sports open spaces
Project objectives
Project objectives were not specified by the initiator
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
При оцінці попиту застосовано аналітично-експертну методологію
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
45 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
2
48 human
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Comprehensive reconstruction of a children's playground with the installation of a safety surface
Technical Solution 2
Current repairs of existing gaming equipment and partial replacement of emergency elements
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)3'590'000 UAH410'000 UAH
For preparation90'000 UAH10'000 UAH
For implementation3'500'000 UAH400'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost170'000 UAH170'000 UAH
For operation120'000 UAH120'000 UAH
For closing50'000 UAH50'000 UAH
Average annual costs15'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.11 months3 months
Deadline for developing a FFS5 months1 month
Implementation period6 months2 months
Service life96 months36 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget3'760'000 UAH580'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)3'590'000 UAH410'000 UAH
For preparation90'000 UAH10'000 UAH
For implementation3'500'000 UAH400'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost170'000 UAH170'000 UAH
For operation120'000 UAH120'000 UAH
For closing50'000 UAH50'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitОб'єкт реконструкції
Service Unit Cost3'760'000 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
18/12/2025SP-L-181225-F6405695Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
22/12/2025SPP-L-221225-C32BF3BBCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-88