Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
Repair and restoration works to restore and preserve the architectural monument of national importance, the M. Tereshchenko Palace in Andrushivka, Zhytomyr region, which houses Andrushivka Lyceum No. 1 of the Andrushivka City Council. The project solves the problems of structural wear, unsatisfactory condition of engineering networks, non-compliance with safety and functionality standards. The expected result is the restoration of the operational characteristics of the building, increasing its reliability and safety for participants in the educational process.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards
Secondary Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions, Improving the quality of services
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
Restoration of the palace is a complex and multifaceted process, the purpose of which is to preserve, restore and return the historical, architectural and cultural value of the building. Such work requires a scientific approach, the participation of specialists from various fields and careful observance of historical authenticity. The purpose of the restoration of the palace is to restore the historical and architectural value of the building through scientifically based measures that provide for the preservation of authentic structures, the restoration of lost decorative elements and the adaptation of the building to modern use, taking into account the requirements for the preservation of cultural heritage. The restoration will make it possible to continue education for students of Andrushivskyi Lyceum No. 1, preserve the monument and create appropriate conditions for its intended use as a secondary educational institution
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The structure of the palace building (walls, roofs, foundation, load-bearing elements) is partially destroyed; the roof needs to be replaced; the foundation has settled and has cracks.
To avoid further destruction, prevent collapses, and ensure the safety of students of Andrushiv Lyceum No. 1, restoration is required. The towers are an architectural accent, the loss of elements reduces the historical value and attractiveness.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of users from low-mobility population groups
18 human
Number of employees of the institution/institution/organization
73 human
Number of IDP users
30 human
Number of people who will use the service
720 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Subsector
Urban planning and landscaping
Stream
Modernization and preservation of cultural infrastructure facilities
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
2.1.1 The municipal infrastructure and transport network of the urban territorial community have been modernized
Project objectives
Project objectives were not specified by the initiator
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?
Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
None of the options are applicable
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?
None of the options are applicable
Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?
None of the options are applicable
Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?
Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Repair and restoration works of the ARCHITECTURAL MONUMENT OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PALACE OF M. TERESCHENKO at 1 Sadova Street in Andrushivka, Zhytomyr region
Technical Solution 2
Roof repair of the M. Tereshchenko Palace in Andrushivka
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)126'520'501 UAH6'200'000 UAH
For preparation727'530 UAH200'000 UAH
For implementation125'792'971 UAH6'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost25'168'594 UAH30'000 UAH
For operation25'158'594 UAH20'000 UAH
For closing10'000 UAH10'000 UAH
Average annual costs100'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.16 months15 months
Deadline for developing a FFS6 months6 months
Implementation period10 months9 months
Service life600 months600 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Централізовані закупівлі: Здійснюються однією організацією для всіх підрозділів, що може забезпечити кращі ціни та стандартизацію.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Для забезпечення прозорості, конкуренції та ефективності в публічних закупівлях буде використано електронну систему закупівель ProZorro, що забезпечує онлайн-публікацію інформації про закупівлі, а також різні конкурентні процедури,
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pre-market engagement
Попереднє залучення ринку під час реставрації маєтку здійснюється через аналіз подібних проєктів, консультації з експертами (архітекторами-реставраторами, істориками), вивчення відкритих тендерів та попередніх закупівель, а також прямі запити до компаній-виконавців та постачальників матеріалів для збору інформації про їхні можливості, досвід та вартість
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Potential market participants
Консультації не проводилися
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Market readiness assessment
Реалізація проєкту можлива за наявності коштів
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget151'689'095 UAH6'230'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)126'520'501 UAH6'200'000 UAH
For preparation727'530 UAH200'000 UAH
For implementation125'792'971 UAH6'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost25'168'594 UAH30'000 UAH
For operation25'158'594 UAH20'000 UAH
For closing10'000 UAH10'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service Unitвартість одиниці послуги
Service Unit Cost30'000 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
None of the options are applicable
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
No, this is the first project of its kind.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
No, I need help.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Environmental experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial consultants/modelers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management experts / project managers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
14/10/2025SP-L-141025-8B84A097Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
17/11/2025SPP-L-171125-32B98BD1Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-54