Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Modernization and preservation of cultural infrastructure facilities
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- Preparation
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
General information
Description of the project
Repair and restoration works to restore and preserve the architectural monument of national importance, the M. Tereshchenko Palace in Andrushivka, Zhytomyr region, which houses Andrushivka Lyceum No. 1 of the Andrushivka City Council. The project solves the problems of structural wear, unsatisfactory condition of engineering networks, non-compliance with safety and functionality standards. The expected result is the restoration of the operational characteristics of the building, increasing its reliability and safety for participants in the educational process.
The purpose of the project
Main goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards
Secondary goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions, Improving the quality of services
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
Restoration of the palace is a complex and multifaceted process, the purpose of which is to preserve, restore and return the historical, architectural and cultural value of the building. Such work requires a scientific approach, the participation of specialists from various fields and careful observance of historical authenticity. The purpose of the restoration of the palace is to restore the historical and architectural value of the building through scientifically based measures that provide for the preservation of authentic structures, the restoration of lost decorative elements and the adaptation of the building to modern use, taking into account the requirements for the preservation of cultural heritage. The restoration will make it possible to continue education for students of Andrushivskyi Lyceum No. 1, preserve the monument and create appropriate conditions for its intended use as a secondary educational institution
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The structure of the palace building (walls, roofs, foundation, load-bearing elements) is partially destroyed; the roof needs to be replaced; the foundation has settled and has cracks.
To avoid further destruction, prevent collapses, and ensure the safety of students of Andrushiv Lyceum No. 1, restoration is required. The towers are an architectural accent, the loss of elements reduces the historical value and attractiveness.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of users from low-mobility population groups
18 human
Number of employees of the institution/institution/organization
73 human
Number of IDP users
30 human
Number of people who will use the service
720 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Subsector
Urban planning and landscaping
Stream
Modernization and preservation of cultural infrastructure facilities
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
2.1.1 The municipal infrastructure and transport network of the urban territorial community have been modernized
Project objectives
Project objectives were not specified by the initiator
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?
Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Проєкт жодним чином не впливає на довкілля
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
The project may result in the forced displacement of women, men and other gender groups or loss of access to resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Other gender risks
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
There are risks of impaired mobility or safety for women, men and other gender groups during construction/operation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
There is a risk of reduced economic opportunities for women, men and other gender groups (e.g. loss of jobs or retail outlets)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Other benefits from project implementation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Envisaged training or advanced training for women in the private sector
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?
Focus groups or consultations with women and vulnerable groups were held
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Feedback on the project design was received from organizations working with women
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
No consultations were held with target groups.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Women's participation is ensured at various stages of planning (including public hearings)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?
All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
A plan to mitigate negative social impacts focused on women has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The percentage of women who could be resettled has been quantified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The percentage of women who may lose or gain access to resources (water, food, healthcare) is quantified.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The percentage of women who will gain new educational/professional opportunities is quantified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
All possible negative impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?
A policy/code of conduct on non-discrimination and gender equality has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
A gender specialist/advisor is included in the project management structure
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Mandatory training for project staff on gender equality and inclusion is provided
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Repair and restoration works of the ARCHITECTURAL MONUMENT OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PALACE OF M. TERESCHENKO at 1 Sadova Street in Andrushivka, Zhytomyr region
Technical Solution 2
Roof repair of the M. Tereshchenko Palace in Andrushivka
Total costs151'689'095 UAH6'230'000 UAH
Average annual costs100'000 UAH10'000 UAH
Project duration, incl.16 months15 months
Service life600 months600 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Централізовані закупівлі: Здійснюються однією організацією для всіх підрозділів, що може забезпечити кращі ціни та стандартизацію.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Для забезпечення прозорості, конкуренції та ефективності в публічних закупівлях буде використано електронну систему закупівель ProZorro, що забезпечує онлайн-публікацію інформації про закупівлі, а також різні конкурентні процедури,
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Other
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Competitive dialogue
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Direct negotiation procedures
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pre-market engagement
Попереднє залучення ринку під час реставрації маєтку здійснюється через аналіз подібних проєктів, консультації з експертами (архітекторами-реставраторами, істориками), вивчення відкритих тендерів та попередніх закупівель, а також прямі запити до компаній-виконавців та постачальників матеріалів для збору інформації про їхні можливості, досвід та вартість
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Potential market participants
Консультації не проводилися
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Market readiness assessment
Реалізація проєкту можлива за наявності коштів
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget151'689'095 UAH6'230'000 UAH
Capital costs151'689'095 UAH6'230'000 UAH
Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH
Preliminary cost breakdown
Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
For preparation727'530 UAH200'000 UAH
For implementation125'792'971 UAH6'000'000 UAH
For operation25'158'594 UAH20'000 UAH
For closing10'000 UAH10'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service Unitвартість одиниці послуги
Service Unit Cost30'000 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?
ResponseNoNo
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - communication with stakeholders
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - risk management
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - public consultations
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - legal support
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial analysis - financial analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - environmental expertise
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of the market environment
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
No, this is the first project of its kind.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic justification - forming a justification for the problem and need
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management rationale - public consultation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of the market environment
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - environmental expertise
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management rationale - project management
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management rationale - communication with stakeholders
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management justification - other
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial analysis - financial analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management rationale - risk management
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management rationale - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management justification - legal support
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
No, I need help.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Specialists in interaction with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Environmental experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Others
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial consultants/modelers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Legal consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Commercial experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic analysts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Technical experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Social/gender consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management experts / project managers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
Development of a full feasibility study;
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Development of design and estimate documentation (DED);
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Other
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
Other
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]