New construction of the Modular Center for the provision of administrative services at 208 Podziguna Generala St., in the village of Oleksandrivka, Voznesensky district, Mykolaiv region

Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Improvement
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project "New construction of the Modular Center for the provision of administrative services at 208 Podziguna Generala Street, in the village of Oleksandrivka, Voznesensky district, Mykolaiv region" (CNAP) in Oleksandrivka aims to create a modern infrastructure for the provision of public services. The creation of the CNAP simplifies citizens' access to administrative services, making them closer to the residents of the village. Improving the quality and speed of service provision due to the concentration of services in one place and the use of new digital solutions

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Creation of new facilities and services

Secondary Goal:

Improving the quality of services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The goal of the project is to create a modern, accessible and energy-efficient point of provision of administrative services in the town of Oleksandrivka. The use of modular technology allows: to reduce construction times compared to capital structures, to provide barrier-free access for low-mobility population groups by designing an entrance at ground level and arranging the adjacent territory

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Without the creation of a modern center, it is impossible to ensure quick access of citizens to administrative services through e-government and digital technologies. Restrictions on access to services: community residents will be forced to spend additional time and resources on obtaining services in geographically remote centers. Ukraine is implementing a single unified approach to strategic planning, where projects must meet the current needs of citizens. The creation of the ASC is part of the strategy for reforming public administration .

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

8514 human

Number of employees of the institution/institution/organization

14 human

Number of IDP users

685 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Municipal infrastructure and services

Subsector

Urban planning and landscaping

Stream

Improvement

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

2.7.1.1 New construction, reconstruction and major repairs of cultural and art institutions

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Number of modular ASCs
0 units
1 units

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Попит визначено на основі аналізу чисельності населення громади, статистики звернень за адміністративними послугами та оцінки доступності існуючої інфраструктури ЦНАП.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
7 thous. people
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
2
7.5 thous. people
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
3
8.5 thous. people
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Confirmation of financing.docx
07.04.2026
12:06:11 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Optimized Eco-Module

Technical Solution 2

Capital construction of LSTK

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)9'299'209 UAH3'780'000 UAH
For preparation1'328'458 UAH280'000 UAH
For implementation7'970'751 UAH3'500'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost1'771'278 UAH2'680'000 UAH
For operation1'107'049 UAH2'500'000 UAH
For closing664'229 UAH180'000 UAH
Average annual costs922'541 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.12 months15 months
Deadline for developing a FFS6 months6 months
Implementation period6 months9 months
Service life240 months600 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
1
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget11'070'487 UAH6'460'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)9'299'209 UAH3'780'000 UAH
For preparation1'328'458 UAH280'000 UAH
For implementation7'970'751 UAH3'500'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost1'771'278 UAH2'680'000 UAH
For operation1'107'049 UAH2'500'000 UAH
For closing664'229 UAH180'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service Unitадміністративна послуга
Service Unit Cost345 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
No – analysis not performed

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
Yes, the project is suitable for PPP

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - economic analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - communication with stakeholders

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - risk management

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - social and gender analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - public consultations

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - legal support

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - demand analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - environmental expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of the market environment

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Partially, we have limited experience

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Financial riskDefinedUndefined

Team involvement

How exactly are/will stakeholders be involved?
Focus group

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Online survey

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Meetings with local authorities

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Public consultations

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Public hearings

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

When are/will engagement activities be taking place?
At the project monitoring stage

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

At the project implementation stage

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

At the project preparation stage

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

How is/will the public be informed about the importance of participation and available channels for feedback?
Social networks

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Local media

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are public hearings being held/will they be held (offline, online)?
Yes, online

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Онлайн слухання
Who will attend the public hearings?
Representatives of public organizations

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Experts

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Community representatives

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Government officials

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Public hearings have already been held
No

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
07/04/2026SP-L-070426-A7D3D278Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyCancellation of the decision to include in a joint ventureThe project is included in the municipal infrastructure and services sector portfolio-
15/04/2026SP-L-150426-281E547CCommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyAwaiting reviewThe project is included in the municipal infrastructure and services sector portfolio-