Major repairs to create a barrier-free environment for accessibility for low-mobility population groups of the building of the CENTER FOR COMPREHENSIVE REHABILITATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES AND PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES "BLAGODAR" at the address: Slavutych, Chernihivskyi quarter, building 13


Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Creating barrier-free routes and implementing barrier-free solutions
Maturity level
77
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

Creating a completely barrier-free, safe and inclusive space, which is critically necessary for an institution whose main mission is the rehabilitation and socialization of people with disabilities. The project is aimed at ensuring free access to all therapeutic and rehabilitation services of the Center in accordance with the highest standards of DBN V.2.2-40:2018. Transforming the Center "Blagodor" into a reference barrier-free space, where the architectural environment does not limit, but rather promotes the rehabilitation process, ensuring dignity, comfort and safety for each visitor - from a small child to an adult.

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities

Secondary Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Improving the quality of services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

Creation of a reference barrier-free space according to the principles of "Universal Design", which ensures full accessibility, safety and comfort for children and adults with severe disabilities while receiving rehabilitation services. The project is aimed at fulfilling the requirements of DBN V.2.2-40:2018 "Inclusivity of buildings and structures". Functional autonomy: Ensuring conditions under which visitors (even with serious musculoskeletal disorders) can move around the institution as independently as possible, which is an important element of social adaptation. Therapeutic environment: Elimination of stress factors (uncomfortable stairs, narrow doors, lack of toilets) that negatively affect the psycho-emotional state of children and their parents. Life safety: Creation of safe evacuation routes for low-mobility population groups (LMG) in case of emergency situations.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The current state of the Blagodar Center's infrastructure significantly limits the effectiveness of rehabilitation activities. Architectural barriers force visitors to spend their energy overcoming obstacles rather than restoring their health, and degrade the dignity of parents and children due to the lack of proper sanitary conditions. Major repairs are urgently needed.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of users from low-mobility population groups

1228 human

Number of IDP users

1285 human

Number of people who will use the service

20865 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Municipal infrastructure and services

Subsector

Urban planning and landscaping

Stream

Creating barrier-free routes and implementing barrier-free solutions

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

4 Implementation of modern urban planning and development practices, creation of barrier-free routes and inclusive infrastructure, within the framework of the project of the Ministry of Development of Communities, Territories and Infrastructure of Ukraine "Barrier-Free Movement"

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Метод демографічного профілювання та соціологічного опитування
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
1100 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
542_KD_ZKR_5.docx
23.02.2026
08:52:12 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Major repairs to create a barrier-free environment for accessibility for low-mobility population groups of the building of the CENTER FOR COMPREHENSIVE REHABILITATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES AND PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES "BLAGODAR" at the address: Slavutych, Chernihivskyi quarter, building 13

Technical Solution 2

Reconstruction of the building of the CENTER FOR COMPREHENSIVE REHABILITATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES AND PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES "BLAGODAR" to provide a barrier-free environment for accessibility for low-mobility population groups at the address: Slavutych, Chernihivskyi quarter, building 13

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)4'858'348 UAH14'200'000 UAH
For preparation456'374 UAH1'200'000 UAH
For implementation4'401'974 UAH13'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost20'001 UAH65'001 UAH
For operation20'000 UAH65'000 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Average annual costs20'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.4 months16 months
Deadline for developing a FFS2 months6 months
Implementation period2 months10 months
Service life180 months600 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
0
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget4'878'349 UAH14'265'001 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)4'858'348 UAH14'200'000 UAH
For preparation456'374 UAH1'200'000 UAH
For implementation4'401'974 UAH13'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost20'001 UAH65'001 UAH
For operation20'000 UAH65'000 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service UnitВартість ремонтних робіт на 1 метр квадратний
Service Unit Cost4'500 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds4'556'374 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds4'858'348 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
None of the options are applicable
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Partially, we have limited experience

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Economic riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
24/02/2026SP-L-240226-18044299Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
06/03/2026SPP-L-060326-52A95CE0Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-77