New construction of a dual-purpose building (with protective properties of an anti-radiation shelter) with a capacity of 300 people using a reuse project on the territory of the Prydniprovske Lyceum of the Chervonogryhorivska settlement council of the Nikopol district of the Dnipropetrovsk region, Dniprostroivska st., building 47-A, Prydniprovske village.


Sector
Education and science
Stream
Arrangement of civil defense protective structures (shelters) in secondary education institutions
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project involves the new construction of an underground reinforced concrete dual-purpose structure with anti-radiation properties on the territory of the Prydniprovsky Lyceum of the Chervonohryhorivskaya Village Council. The structure is designed to shelter 300 people - students, teachers and staff.

The facility will be built according to a reuse project, which shortens the implementation period, reduces the cost of design and ensures compliance with the current DBN on civil protection, safety and accessibility. The project provides for a full range of engineering systems: power supply with a backup diesel generator, ventilation, water supply and drainage, sanitary and household premises, evacuation exits, as well as landscaping of the territory. The main problem that the project solves is - lack of shelter in a general secondary education institution located in a frontline community, which makes in-person learning impossible and creates a constant threat to the lives of participants in the educational process,  including children of internally displaced persons, servicemen, and orphans. The community territory is regularly subjected to artillery shelling, and the existing structures do not provide the proper level of protection. 

Expected results:

  • creation of safe conditions for 300 people during emergencies;
  • resumption of full-time education at the Prydniprovsky Lyceum;
  •  increasing the level of civil protection and social resilience of the community;
  •  forming a safe educational environment that meets state standards and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 3, 4, 11).

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Improving the condition of infrastructure

Secondary goal:

Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

In the context of the worsening security situation in Ukraine, as well as in the frontline territory of the Chervonogryhorivska settlement territorial community of the Dnipropetrovsk region, most secondary education institutions do not have properly equipped protective structures for civil defense (shelters). The absence or unsatisfactory condition of shelters creates serious risks to the life and health of students and teaching staff in the event of emergencies, in particular military operations. The location of the community in close proximity to the occupied territories of the aggressor country made it impossible for students to attend the traditional in-person education at the Prydniprovska Lyceum. The construction of a new protective structure for civil defense will ensure the creation of safe conditions for all participants in the educational process at the Prydniprovska Lyceum and will allow for the possibility of in-person education for children of the community, maintain the quality of education, and protect the physical and mental health of students and employees of the institution.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Problem: lack of a civil defense protective structure in a secondary education institution, which makes it impossible to have a safe in-person educational process for students and teachers. Solution: construction of a civil defense protective structure will create a safe educational environment and open access to in-person education

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

300 human

Number of employees of the institution/institution/organization

63 human

Number of IDP users

47 human

Other functional

237 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

Arrangement of civil defense protective structures (shelters) in secondary education institutions

Strategic document

Task

2.2.1. Improving the material and technical base of educational institutions, in particular through the reconstruction of institutions damaged by shelling, taking into account thermal modernization, energy efficiency, and the arrangement of shelters

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Number of students who will have access to secure offline learning
0 human
237 human
Improvement of infrastructure
0 %
100 %
Number of facility employees who will have access to a secure offline environment
0 human
63 human

Demand for the service and its dynamics

Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
1 units
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
2
1 units
Economic justification

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Monolithic reinforced concrete underground structure

Technical Solution 2

Modular prefabricated civil defense building

Total costs141'474'916 UAH45'940'000 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 836'244 UAH600'000 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 95'638'672 UAH45'000'000 UAH
  • For operation
  • 45'000'000 UAH300'000 UAH
  • For closing
  • 0 UAH40'000 UAH
    Average annual costs900'000 UAH300'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.15 months7 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 6 months3 months
  • Implementation period
  • 9 months4 months
    Service life600 months240 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active
    Rejected
    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    1
    To components
    0

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget141'474'916 UAH45'940'000 UAH
    Capital costs141'474'916 UAH45'940'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation836'244 UAH600'000 UAH
    For implementation95'638'672 UAH45'000'000 UAH
    For operation45'000'000 UAH300'000 UAH
    For closing0 UAH40'000 UAH

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service Unit1 особа (місце в укритті)
    Service Unit Cost323'317 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds836'244 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds96'474'916 UAH0 UAH
    Management Rationale

    Risk assessment

    Technical riskDefinedUndefined
    Financial riskDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Economic Analysis
    Social benefits and costs
    Social benefits: The project provides guaranteed physical protection for 300 people in the high-risk zone, creates conditions for continuous offline learning for 237 students and safe work for 63 employees. Implementation reduces the risks of injury and death during shelling, improves the psycho-emotional state of children, increases community resilience, reduces the risk of forced migration of families, and contributes to the preservation of human capital. Social costs: Temporary inconvenience during construction (noise, partial restriction of the lyceum territory) and burden on the local budget in terms of operating costs.
    Environmental benefits and costs
    Environmental benefits: The project uses energy-efficient engineering solutions, LED lighting and thermal insulation materials, which reduces energy consumption and CO₂ emissions. Ventilation systems provide air purification, and landscaping improves the local ecological environment. Environmental costs: During construction, there is a short-term impact (equipment operation, construction waste generation). During operation, additional energy consumption for ventilation and emergency power supply. All impacts remain within environmental standards and are subject to control.
    Indirect benefits and costs
    Indirect benefits: Increasing the investment attractiveness of the community, strengthening the educational infrastructure, avoiding economic losses from interruption of education, maintaining demographic stability, increasing social cohesion, increasing trust in local governments. Additionally, a positive impact on employment during the project implementation period. Indirect costs: Long-term costs for equipment maintenance, the possibility of increasing the cost of utilities and energy in the future, additional costs for periodic modernization of engineering systems.