New construction of a civil defense protective structure (radiation shelter) on the territory of the municipal institution "Zlatopil Lyceum No. 2 of the Zlatopil City Council of the Kharkiv region" located at the address: 64102, Kharkiv region, Lozovsky district, Zlatopil city, Centralna st., building 2-a
Sector
Education and science
Stream
"New construction of a protective civil defense structure (radiation shelter) on the territory of the municipal institution "Zlatopil Lyceum No. 2 of the Zlatopil City Council of the Kharkiv region" located at the address: 64102, Kharkiv region, Lozovsky district, Zlatopil city, Centralna st., building 2-a"
Maturity level
81
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The construction of a protective civil defense structure (radiation shelter) on the territory of the municipal institution "Zlatopil Lyceum No. 2 of the Zlatopil City Council of the Kharkiv Region" will provide a safe space for students, teaching staff and technical personnel of the institution, who will be able to continue their studies and work process during shelling and emergencies.
The project provides for the construction of a shelter with an underground passage directly from the lyceum building. The shelter is of a fully buried type with a corridor planning system. Evacuation exits are located on the left side towards the sports grounds on the mountain.
The protective structure (radiation shelter) is designed to ensure accessibility for people with disabilities and other low-mobility groups in accordance with the requirements of DBN V.2.2-40.
The radiation shelter structure is designed to ensure protection against dangerous factors in the event of emergencies.
The project provides for the installation of external heat supply networks to connect the protective structure. The source of heat supply is an individual block-modular boiler room, located separately on the territory of the institution.
Returning to live communication with teachers and peers will help children reduce psychological trauma from distance learning.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards
Secondary Goal:
Improving the condition of infrastructure, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions, Meeting demand
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
Creating a safe educational environment by building a modern anti-radiation shelter will ensure continuous in-person learning and physical protection for students and lyceum staff in emergency situations. Ensuring the right of children to safe in-person education and socialization through the construction of an inclusive protective structure integrated into the lyceum infrastructure, with full compliance with accessibility standards and autonomous life support.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The institution does not have proper shelter, which makes it impossible for children to stay in the building during air raids. Due to the lack of a protective structure, the lyceum operates online, which reduces the quality of education.
As a result of the project, a protected perimeter will be created (thanks to an underground passage and a buried type of structure), which minimizes evacuation time and risks. Connection to a block-modular boiler room will provide the proper temperature regime, allowing the shelter to be used as a multifunctional space.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of people who will use the service
649 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Education and science
Subsector
School education
Stream
"New construction of a protective civil defense structure (radiation shelter) on the territory of the municipal institution "Zlatopil Lyceum No. 2 of the Zlatopil City Council of the Kharkiv region" located at the address: 64102, Kharkiv region, Lozovsky district, Zlatopil city, Centralna st., building 2-a"
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
2.1.1. Provide a response to challenges related to military threats
Project objectives
Project objectives were not specified by the initiator
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
Community Development Strategy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
1 units
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
1 units
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?
Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
None of the options are applicable
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?
None of the options are applicable
Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?
None of the options are applicable
Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?
Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
New construction of a protective structure of civil defense (anti-radiation shelter)
Technical Solution 2
Use of prefabricated reinforced concrete or metal modules on the territory of the municipal institution "Zlatopil Lyceum No. 2 of the Zlatopil City Council of the Kharkiv Region"
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)199'045'287 UAH28'400'000 UAH
For preparation1'954'936 UAH2'400'000 UAH
For implementation197'090'351 UAH26'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost0 UAH2'300'000 UAH
For operation0 UAH300'000 UAH
For closing0 UAH2'000'000 UAH
Average annual costs4'000'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.12 months14 months
Deadline for developing a FFS3 months3 months
Implementation period9 months11 months
Service life360 months360 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Для реалізації проєкту обрано стратегію здійснення публічних закупівель відповідно до Постанови Кабінету Міністрів України № 1178 від 12.10.2022 (зі змінами), яка встановлює особливості проведення закупівель в умовах воєнного стану із використанням електронної системи ProZorro. Стратегія передбачає проведення відкритих і конкурентних процедур з урахуванням специфіки будівельного ринку, масштабів проєкту та необхідності дотримання встановлених строків реалізації. Закупівлі планується здійснювати поетапно (проєктні роботи, будівельно-монтажні роботи, технічний та авторський нагляд), що дозволяє підвищити конкуренцію та залучити спеціалізованих виконавців. Обрана стратегія є доцільною, оскільки забезпечує баланс між оперативністю, прозорістю та ефективністю використання бюджетних коштів, мінімізує ризики затримок у реалізації проєкту та відповідає чинному законодавству України.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Для реалізації проєкту планується застосування стандартних і перевірених підходів до публічних закупівель, що забезпечують прозорість, конкуренцію та ефективне використання коштів. Усі закупівлі здійснюватимуться через електронну систему ProZorro відповідно до вимог Закону України «Про публічні закупівлі», що гарантує відкритість процедур і рівний доступ потенційних учасників. Тендерна документація формуватиметься з чіткими та недискримінаційними кваліфікаційними вимогами, що сприятиме залученню конкурентного кола підрядників. Контроль якості закупівель і виконання договорів забезпечуватиметься шляхом технічного та авторського нагляду, а також внутрішнього фінансового контролю замовника. Інформація про проведені закупівлі, укладені договори та хід реалізації проєкту підлягатиме публічному оприлюдненню у встановленому законодавством порядку, що забезпечить прозорість і підзвітність використання бюджетних коштів.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pre-market engagement
Попереднє залучення ринку здійснювалося на етапі підготовки проєкту з метою оцінки наявних пропозицій, рівня конкуренції та орієнтовної вартості робіт. Для збору інформації було використано аналіз відкритих даних електронної системи ProZorro, зокрема огляд аналогічних тендерів з будівництва та облаштування захисних споруд у закладах освіти. Також проведено аналіз реалізованих і поточних проєктів у інших територіальних громадах Харківської області та суміжних регіонах. Для уточнення технічних і нормативних аспектів проєкту здійснювалися консультації з профільними фахівцями у сфері проєктування та будівництва об’єктів цивільного захисту. Отримана інформація була використана для формування технічних вимог, орієнтовної вартості проєкту та вибору оптимальної стратегії закупівель з урахуванням реального стану ринку.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Potential market participants
У процесі підготовки проєкту здійснювалися неформальні консультації з представниками ринку та профільними фахівцями у сфері проєктування і будівництва захисних споруд цивільного захисту. Консультації мали інформаційний характер та стосувалися орієнтовної вартості робіт, строків реалізації, технічних рішень і спроможності ринку виконувати подібні проєкти в умовах воєнного стану. Аналіз відкритих даних електронної системи ProZorro свідчить про наявність достатнього рівня конкуренції, зокрема серед підрядних організацій, що мають досвід будівництва об’єктів соціальної інфраструктури та захисних споруд. Потенційними учасниками закупівель можуть бути: • проєктні організації, що мають ліцензії та досвід проєктування об’єктів цивільного захисту; • будівельні компанії, які виконують загальнобудівельні та спеціалізовані роботи; • інженерні та експертні організації, що здійснюють технічний нагляд і експертизу проєктної документації.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Market readiness assessment
Ринок загалом готовий до реалізації проєктів будівництва та модернізації захисних споруд цивільного захисту для закладів загальної середньої освіти. В Україні наявна достатня кількість проєктних і будівельних організацій, які мають відповідні ліцензії, кваліфікований персонал та практичний досвід виконання аналогічних робіт у сфері соціальної інфраструктури. Основні технології, матеріали та інженерні рішення, необхідні для будівництва протирадіаційних укриттів, є доступними на внутрішньому ринку, а ланцюги постачання загалом функціонують стабільно. Також сформовано інституційну спроможність щодо проведення експертизи проєктної документації та технічного нагляду. Потенційними бар’єрами можуть бути коливання цін на будівельні матеріали, обмежені строки виконання робіт та регуляторні процедури погодження проєктної документації. Водночас зазначені ризики є типовими для будівельної галузі та можуть бути мінімізовані шляхом належного планування, застосування конкурентних процедур закупівель та поетапної реалізації проєкту.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget199'045'287 UAH30'700'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)199'045'287 UAH28'400'000 UAH
For preparation1'954'936 UAH2'400'000 UAH
For implementation197'090'351 UAH26'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost0 UAH2'300'000 UAH
For operation0 UAH300'000 UAH
For closing0 UAH2'000'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitВартість одиниці послуги
Service Unit Cost306'700 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial analysis - financial analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - environmental expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of the market environment
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Management justification - legal support
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
No, I need help.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Specialists in interaction with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Environmental experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial consultants/modelers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Legal consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Commercial experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic analysts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Technical experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Social/gender consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management experts / project managers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Organizational events
ResponseDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
26/12/2025SP-L-261225-20079F80Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
11/01/2026SP-N-110126-11CA20B7State SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
28/12/2025SPP-L-281225-DEE59E52Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-81