Major renovation of Bratska Street (construction of a barrier-free route for people with reduced mobility) in the village of Velyka Oleksandrivka, Beryslav district, Kherson region
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Development and rehabilitation of municipal infrastructure of subnational governments
Maturity level
75
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The project involves the major renovation of a section of Bratska Street in the village of Velyka Oleksandrivka in order to create a barrier-free route for people with reduced mobility. The implementation of the first stage of the 1 km route will ensure safe, convenient and unhindered movement of pedestrians, including people with disabilities, the elderly, parents with strollers and other MGN, as well as improve access to social and public infrastructure facilities.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities
Secondary Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Reducing territorial or social gaps
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
The goal of the project is to ensure inclusivity and equality of opportunity by creating a barrier-free pedestrian route on Bratska Street in the village of Velyka Oleksandrivka, which will provide safe and convenient access to public, administrative and transport infrastructure facilities for all population groups, including persons with disabilities and other groups with limited mobility.
The achievement of this goal is envisaged through the implementation of a set of measures, including: the construction and restoration of sidewalks with regulatory slopes, lowering curbs at intersections with the carriageway, the construction of ramps, the arrangement of manholes to the level of the sidewalk, the application of road markings and the installation of pedestrian crossing signs, the construction of traffic calming elements, as well as the removal of physical obstacles that complicate the movement of pedestrians.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The main problem is the lack of a barrier-free, safe and continuous pedestrian environment on Bratska Street, which significantly limits the possibilities of movement for people with disabilities, low-mobility groups, the elderly, parents with strollers and other pedestrians. The existing infrastructure is characterized by the absence or unsatisfactory condition of sidewalks, non-standard ramps, the absence of lowered curbs, road markings and pedestrian crossing signs, as well as numerous physical obstacles.
These problems are especially relevant at the moment, since Bratska Street provides access to social, administrative, transport and commercial infrastructure facilities, in particular educational, trade, transport and public institutions. The existing barriers create increased risks of injury, limit independent movement and actually exclude part of the population from the full use of public space.
If these problems are not resolved, inequality of access to services will persist, road safety and the quality of life of community residents will deteriorate.
The implementation of the project will eliminate infrastructure barriers, create a continuous barrier-free route, increase pedestrian safety, ensure equal mobility opportunities for all population groups, and improve the accessibility of key community facilities.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of users from low-mobility population groups
567 human
Population in the geographical area of influence of the project
11660 human
Other social
1278 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Subsector
Development and Reconstruction of Subnational Infrastructure
Stream
Development and rehabilitation of municipal infrastructure of subnational governments
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
1.1.2 Ensure the development of cultural and local heritage protection centers that form local self-awareness and bind residents to their places of residence
Project objectives
Indicator
Base value
Target value
Length of barrier-free walking route
0 km
1 km
Part of the route brought to safety and accessibility requirements
0 %
100 %
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?
Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
None of the options are applicable
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
Other benefits from project implementation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?
Focus groups or consultations with women and vulnerable groups were held
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
No consultations were held with target groups.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Women's participation is ensured at various stages of planning (including public hearings)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?
All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
All possible negative impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?
Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Major renovation of Bratska Street (construction of a barrier-free route for people with reduced mobility) in the village of Velyka Oleksandrivka, Beryslav district, Kherson region
Technical Solution 2
Current repairs of Bratska Street without comprehensive implementation of barrier-free measures
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)81'622'000 UAH15'500'000 UAH
For preparation1'622'000 UAH500'000 UAH
For implementation80'000'000 UAH15'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost21'600'001 UAH1'125'001 UAH
For operation21'600'000 UAH1'125'000 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Average annual costs1'200'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.15 months6 months
Deadline for developing a FFS3 months2 months
Implementation period12 months4 months
Service life216 months60 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Для реалізації проєкту застосовуватимуться процедури відкритих торгів у системі Prozorro, що відповідає вимогам Закону України «Про публічні закупівлі». Така стратегія забезпечує прозорість витрачання бюджетних коштів, конкуренцію серед підрядників та вибір найбільш економічно вигідної пропозиції. Закупівлі здійснюватимуться відповідно до проектно-кошторисної документації, що пройшла державну експертизу.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Закупівлі будуть здійсненні за процедурою відкриті торги, згідно Постанови Кабінету Міністрів України № 1178 від 12.10.2022 р. "Про затвердження особливостей здійснення публічних закупівель товарів, робіт і послуг для замовників, передбачених Законом України “Про публічні закупівлі”, на період дії правового режиму воєнного стану в Україні та протягом 90 днів з дня його припинення або скасування"
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pre-market engagement
Очікувана вартість предмета закупівель розрахована зведеного кошторисного розрахунку, який пройшов експертизу.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Potential market participants
Не планується проводити, у зв'язку з тим, що до закупівлі буде застосована конкурентна процедура "відкритих торгів"
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Market readiness assessment
ринок готовий до реалізації проєкту
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget103'222'001 UAH16'625'001 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)81'622'000 UAH15'500'000 UAH
For preparation1'622'000 UAH500'000 UAH
For implementation80'000'000 UAH15'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost21'600'001 UAH1'125'001 UAH
For operation21'600'000 UAH1'125'000 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service Unit1 км безбар’єрного пішохідного маршруту
Service Unit Cost80'000'000 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - communication with stakeholders
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - risk management
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - public consultations
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - legal support
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of the market environment
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Partially, we have limited experience
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Specialists in interaction with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial consultants/modelers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Legal consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Commercial experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic analysts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Social/gender consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management experts / project managers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Social riskDefinedUndefined
Organizational events
ResponseDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
Development of design and estimate documentation (DED);
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
05/02/2026SP-L-050226-D460C76FCommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeStrategic fit confirmed-
11/02/2026SPP-L-110226-2B602232Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeStrategic fit confirmed75