New construction of the local automated centralized notification system (MASTSO) of the Bereznehuvatsk settlement council, Bashtansky district, Mykolaiv region


Sector
Public safety
Stream
Arrangement of shelters and implementation of a civil defense alert system in the community's settlements
Maturity level
83
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project "New construction of a local automated centralized warning system (MASTSO) of Bereznehuvatsk settlement council, Bashtansky district, Mykolaiv region" is aimed at increasing the level of population safety by creating a modern system of prompt information about emergencies and threats. The project plans to install equipment for an automated warning system, install loudspeakers in 12 settlements of the community, integrate with the regional civil protection network and provide remote control capabilities. This will ensure timely notification of community residents, minimize risks to people's lives and health, and increase the territory's resilience to military, man-made, and natural threats. 

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards

Secondary Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards, Creation of new facilities and services, Improving the condition of infrastructure

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The purpose of the public investment project is to increase the level of security of the population of the Bereznehuvat settlement territorial community by creating a modern local automated centralized warning system (MACS), which will ensure timely, reliable and complete information to residents about emergencies, military threats, man-made accidents and natural disasters. Today, the Bereznehuvat community lacks a modern and effective centralized warning system. Existing means of information are fragmented, do not cover all residents of the community and do not provide a prompt response in the event of emergencies. This creates a significant risk to the life and health of the population, especially in conditions of military threats, active hostilities in the region and an increased probability of man-made and natural disasters. The planned project will allow to overcome this gap, because thanks to the implementation of MACS, the community will be able to quickly and centrally warn the population about dangers. The expected target level is to reach 95–100% of community residents with alert signals, which will significantly reduce risks to people and increase community preparedness to respond to emergencies.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The key problem that the project should solve is the insufficiency of a modern centralized warning system in the Bereznehuvat community. Today, some settlements are equipped with sirens, but they do not cover the entire territory of the community and do not provide full coverage of the population. Additionally, the population receives information through the media, social networks and fragmented channels, which does not allow for timely information to all residents, especially in remote settlements. Another problem is the low efficiency and reliability of existing warning means. In the event of an emergency, the message may arrive with a significant delay or not reach people at all, which poses a threat to their life and health. An additional factor is the lack of integration with the regional civil protection system, which complicates interaction during military threats, man-made accidents or natural disasters. High dependence on the human factor in the process of transmitting information also reduces the effectiveness of the response. These problems are especially relevant now, since the community is located in a zone of increased military risks, and the probability of natural disasters and man-made accidents is also increasing, which increases the need for a reliable and operational warning system. If these problems are not resolved, there is a risk of untimely informing the population, which can lead to significant human losses and material damage. The lack of clear and reliable information in crisis situations can cause panic among people, complicate evacuation measures and reduce the level of citizens' trust in the authorities. The implementation of the project will allow creating a modern automated centralized warning system capable of covering the entire territory of the community and up to 95–100% of residents. This will reduce the time for informing the population from tens of minutes to several seconds, which will significantly increase the level of security and readiness of the community to respond to emergencies. The expected result is a reduction in the risk of human casualties and material damage, strengthening the community's capacity in the field of civil protection, and increasing its resilience to modern challenges.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

16600 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Public safety

Subsector

Civil defense

Stream

Arrangement of shelters and implementation of a civil defense alert system in the community's settlements

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

1.2 Develop public safety infrastructure

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Statistical data
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
16600 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

None of the options are applicable

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Expert report.pdf
02.10.2025
08:57:50 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

New construction of a local automated centralized warning system (MACS)

Technical Solution 2

Modernization of existing sirens and partial integration with the regional alert system.

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)15'816'175 UAH160'000 UAH
For preparation150'000 UAH10'000 UAH
For implementation15'666'175 UAH150'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost100'001 UAH100'001 UAH
For operation100'000 UAH100'000 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Average annual costs150'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.10 months14 months
Deadline for developing a FFS3 months2 months
Implementation period7 months12 months
Service life120 months24 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
0
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget15'916'176 UAH260'001 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)15'816'175 UAH160'000 UAH
For preparation150'000 UAH10'000 UAH
For implementation15'666'175 UAH150'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost100'001 UAH100'001 UAH
For operation100'000 UAH100'000 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service UnitСередня вартість на одного отримувача послуги
Service Unit Cost940 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds150'000 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds150'000 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - economic analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - communication with stakeholders

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - risk management

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - social and gender analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - public consultations

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - legal support

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - demand analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - environmental expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of the market environment

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
No, this is the first project of its kind.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
03/10/2025SP-L-031025-412B58ECCommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
31/03/2026SP-N-310326-2905B2BBState SPInvestment Feasibility StudyDisqualified--
28/10/2025SPP-L-281025-69DA26EFCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-83