Reconstruction of the catering unit of the Silets ZZSO of the 1st-3rd centuries at 27 Shkilna Street in the village of Siltse, Beregivskyi district, Transcarpathian region


Sector
Education and science
Stream
Ensuring access to high-quality and safe food in educational institutions through the development of modern canteen infrastructure (food blocks)
Maturity level
78
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Implementation
Completion

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards

Secondary Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Improving the quality of services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The implementation of the project will ensure: the reconstruction of the catering unit will ensure the organization of high-quality and safe nutrition for all participants in the educational process (over 500 children) in compliance with the principles of the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) system in accordance with the Strategy for Reforming the School Nutrition System for the Period Until 2027 (CMU Resolution No. 990-r dated October 27, 2023); updating the material and technical base of the dining room catering unit; forming a culture of healthy eating among children. The creation of a modern catering unit in the Siletsk secondary education institution of I-III levels of Kamyansk village council of the Berehiv district of the Zakarpattia region is planned in accordance with the “Basic Kitchen” model. This project will contribute to the implementation of the school nutrition reform initiated by First Lady Olena Zelenska, which is aimed at providing children with high-quality, safe and nutritious nutrition in educational institutions, forming a culture of healthy eating and spreading it among Ukrainian families. During the full-scale war, the project gained even greater importance, as it became a form of protection for our children, care for their present, overshadowed by Russian aggression. It is necessary to teach children to make choices in favor of a balanced diet, to abandon bad habits. And we must create the best conditions for them so that they have the strength to study, plan for the future and implement their plans.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of IDP users

50 human

Number of people who will use the service

700 human

Population in the geographical area of influence of the project

2000 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

Ensuring access to high-quality and safe food in educational institutions through the development of modern canteen infrastructure (food blocks)

Strategic document

Strategy for Reforming the School Nutrition System until 2027

Task

2.1 Providing quality education and preschool services in the community

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

кількісна та якісна
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
550 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

None of the options are applicable

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Village catering unit.pdf
30.12.2025
19:48:15 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Reconstruction of the catering unit of the Silets ZZSO of the 1st-3rd centuries at 27 Shkilna Street in the village of Siltse, Beregivskyi district, Transcarpathian region

Technical Solution 2

Major repairs of the catering unit of the Siletsk Secondary Educational Service of the 1st-3rd grades at 27 Shkilna Street in the village of Siltse, Beregivskyi district, Zakarpattia region

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)6'626'268 UAH4'550'000 UAH
For preparation84'335 UAH50'000 UAH
For implementation6'541'933 UAH4'500'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost107'162 UAH30'000 UAH
For closing107'162 UAH30'000 UAH
Average annual costs500'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.5 months5 months
Deadline for developing a FFS1 month1 month
Implementation period4 months4 months
Service life600 months120 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Unsuccessful

[The technical approach was analyzed and considered for implementation but was not selected as the final option.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
1
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Yes, only national

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget6'733'430 UAH4'580'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)6'626'268 UAH4'550'000 UAH
For preparation84'335 UAH50'000 UAH
For implementation6'541'933 UAH4'500'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost107'162 UAH30'000 UAH
For operation0 UAH0 UAH
For closing107'162 UAH30'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service Unitвартість проекту на одного отримувачавартість на одного отримувача послуги
Service Unit Cost9'619 UAH22'900 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
No – analysis not performed

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No – analysis not performed

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesYes

Funding Sources

Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No, no assessment was conducted.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
30/12/2025SP-L-301225-C024C8E0Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
13/02/2026SP-N-130226-6824768CState SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
31/12/2025SPP-L-311225-7E0AEA18Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-78