New construction of a protective civil defense structure (radiation shelter) on the territory of the municipal institution "Pervomaisky Lyceum No. 3 "Success" of the Pervomaisky City Council of the Kharkiv region" located at: 64107, Kharkiv region, Lozovsky district, Pervomaisky city, Sportivna street, 34


Sector
Education and science
Stream
"New construction of a protective civil defense structure (radiation shelter) on the territory of the municipal institution "Pervomaisky Lyceum No. 3 "Success" of the Pervomaisky City Council of the Kharkiv region" located at the address: 64107, Kharkiv region, Lozovsky district, Pervomaisky city, Sportivna street, 34
Maturity level
83
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project involves the construction of a new civil defense protective structure — anti-radiation shelter — on the territory of the municipal institution «Pervomaisky Lyceum No. 3 «Uspikh» of the Pervomaisky City Council of the Kharkiv region at the address: 64107, Kharkiv region, Lozov district, Pervomaisky city, Sportivna st., 34. The goal of the project is to ensure the safety of students and employees of the educational institution in conditions of military threats and emergencies by creating a modern, reliable and normatively justified shelter. The implementation of the project will allow solving the problem of the lack of sufficient protective space that meets the requirements of current building codes and civil defense standards. The expected results are to increase the level of protection of children and staff of the lyceum, ensure the continuity of the educational process even in crisis conditions, as well as strengthen the overall security and stability of the social infrastructure of the community.

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Improving the condition of infrastructure

Secondary Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

Project goal detail The goal of the public investment project is to increase the level of safety of students and employees of the municipal institution "Pervomaisky Lyceum No. 3 "Uspikh" by creating a modern protective civil defense structure (anti-radiation shelter), which fully meets the requirements of current state building codes and civil defense standards. The implementation of the project is aimed at strengthening the community's social infrastructure and ensuring the continuity of the educational process in conditions of military threats and emergencies. Methods of achieving the goal The goal is expected to be achieved by: new construction of a separately located underground protective civil defense structure on the territory of the lyceum; implementation of architectural, planning and design solutions that provide the necessary level of strength, tightness and protective properties of the structure; equipping the shelter with engineering systems (ventilation, heating, water supply, electricity supply, fire alarm and emergency lighting) in accordance with the requirements of DBN V.2.2-5:2023 “Civil defense protective structures”; ensuring unhindered access and safe stay of persons with disabilities and other low-mobility population groups; compliance with the requirements of energy efficiency, fire, technogenic and sanitary and epidemiological safety during the construction and further operation of the facility. Justification of the gap between the current state and the target level The current state is characterized by the absence of a civil defense protective structure on the territory of the lyceum, which could provide an appropriate level of safety for all students and employees of the educational institution. The existing premises do not meet modern regulatory requirements for capacity, level of protection, engineering support and accessibility, which creates significant risks to the life and health of people in the event of emergencies or military operations. The target level provides for the availability of a certified anti-radiation shelter, designed for the full number of students and staff of the lyceum, with an appropriate level of protection, comfortable conditions for temporary stay and the possibility of safe operation. The implementation of the project will allow to eliminate the existing infrastructure and security gap, bring the conditions of operation of the educational institution in line with modern civil protection standards and increase the resilience of the community to crisis challenges.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Key issues, relevance and expected changes 1. Lack of proper civil defense protective structure Currently, there is no specially equipped anti-radiation shelter on the territory of the municipal institution "Pervomaisky Lyceum No. 3 "Uspikh" that would meet the current requirements of the State Code of Ukraine regarding capacity, level of protection and engineering support. This problem is especially relevant in conditions of martial law and constant security threats typical of the Kharkiv region. If the issue is not resolved, there is a real risk of a threat to the life and health of students and employees of the institution, as well as the impossibility of prompt and safe shelter during air raids or other emergencies. 2. Non-compliance of existing premises with modern safety standards The existing auxiliary or basement premises of the lyceum do not have the necessary structural and engineering characteristics for use as civil defense protective structures. They do not provide the regulatory level of protection against the blast wave, radiation exposure and secondary damaging factors, and are not equipped with filter ventilation systems, autonomous power supply and guaranteed water supply. Failure to resolve this problem leads to formal, but not actual, compliance with civil protection requirements, which reduces the overall level of safety of the educational environment. 3. Limited coverage of the target audience and insufficient capacity The existing infrastructure does not allow for the simultaneous provision of shelter for all students and employees of the educational institution. This creates unequal security conditions and increases social tension among parents and teaching staff. In the absence of a design solution, possible consequences are the suspension or restriction of the educational process, reduced attendance and deterioration of the psychological state of children. 4. Lack of accessibility conditions for low-mobility population groups The existing premises do not provide unhindered access and safe stay for persons with disabilities and other low-mobility population groups. This contradicts the principles of inclusiveness and equal opportunities. Failure to resolve the problem leads to discriminatory conditions and violation of the rights of certain categories of participants in the educational process. 5. Low resilience of educational infrastructure to crisis situations The lack of a modern protective structure reduces the overall readiness of the educational institution to respond to emergencies and military threats. This negatively affects the resilience of the community as a whole. In the event of inaction, the consequences may be long breaks in education, a decrease in the quality of educational services and an increase in population migration from the community. Expected positive changes as a result of the project implementation The implementation of the project for the construction of a new anti-radiation shelter will ensure full protection of the life and health of students and employees of the lyceum, compliance of the facility with modern standards of civil protection and security, and will also create conditions for a continuous and stable educational process. The project will help increase the level of trust among parents and the community, strengthen the social resilience of the territorial community, and improve the overall state of the educational infrastructure in the face of modern challenges.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

364 human

Other functional

1043.24 m2

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

"New construction of a protective civil defense structure (radiation shelter) on the territory of the municipal institution "Pervomaisky Lyceum No. 3 "Success" of the Pervomaisky City Council of the Kharkiv region" located at the address: 64107, Kharkiv region, Lozovsky district, Pervomaisky city, Sportivna street, 34

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

2.1.1. Provide a response to challenges related to military threats

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Number of children who received access to adequate shelter in an educational institution
0 human
400 human

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Методологія оцінки попиту на послугу При оцінці попиту на послугу із забезпечення укриття учнів та працівників комунального закладу «Первомайський ліцей № 3 «Успіх» застосовувалася розрахунково-нормативна (інженерно-нормативна) методологія. Суть застосованої методології полягає у визначенні необхідної місткості та параметрів захисної споруди на основі: фактичної чисельності цільової аудиторії закладу освіти (учнів, педагогічних та інших працівників), які одночасно перебувають у ліцеї; нормативних вимог чинних державних будівельних норм і стандартів цивільного захисту (зокрема ДБН В.2.2-5:2023 «Захисні споруди цивільного захисту»), що регламентують площу, об’єм та умови перебування однієї особи в протирадіаційному укритті; функціонального призначення об’єкта та режиму його експлуатації в умовах надзвичайних ситуацій. Методологія не ґрунтується на ринковому чи платоспроможному попиті, оскільки послуга має соціальний та безпековий характер і є обов’язковою складовою функціонування закладу освіти. Попит визначається нормативною необхідністю забезпечення 100 % охоплення учнів і працівників ліцею захисними умовами, що обумовлює стабільний, постійний та прогнозований характер попиту незалежно від зовнішніх економічних чинників.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
26
364 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
27
400 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
28
450 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?

No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?

Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?

No consultations were held with target groups.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?

All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
All possible negative impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?

Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Economic analysis.pdf
26.12.2025
09:51:35 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

New construction of a protective civil defense structure (radiation shelter) on the territory of the municipal institution "Pervomaisky Lyceum No. 3 "Success" of the Pervomaisky City Council of the Kharkiv region" located at: 64107, Kharkiv region, Lozovsky district, Pervomaisky city, Sportivna street, 34

Technical Solution 2

Reconstruction and adaptation of the existing basement premises of the lyceum for a civil defense protective structure (radiation shelter)

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)149'184'476 UAH18'000'000 UAH
For preparation479'920 UAH2'000'000 UAH
For implementation148'704'556 UAH16'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost0 UAH0 UAH
Average annual costs0 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.10 months12 months
Deadline for developing a FFS1 month3 months
Implementation period9 months9 months
Service life240 months240 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
1
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Для реалізації проєкту обрано стратегію здійснення публічних закупівель відповідно до Постанови Кабінету Міністрів України № 1178 від 12.10.2022 (зі змінами), яка встановлює особливості проведення закупівель в умовах воєнного стану із використанням електронної системи ProZorro. Стратегія передбачає проведення відкритих і конкурентних процедур з урахуванням специфіки будівельного ринку, масштабів проєкту та необхідності дотримання встановлених строків реалізації. Закупівлі планується здійснювати поетапно (проєктні роботи, будівельно-монтажні роботи, технічний та авторський нагляд), що дозволяє підвищити конкуренцію та залучити спеціалізованих виконавців. Обрана стратегія є доцільною, оскільки забезпечує баланс між оперативністю, прозорістю та ефективністю використання бюджетних коштів, мінімізує ризики затримок у реалізації проєкту та відповідає чинному законодавству України.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Для реалізації проєкту планується застосування стандартних і перевірених підходів до публічних закупівель, що забезпечують прозорість, конкуренцію та ефективне використання коштів. Усі закупівлі здійснюватимуться через електронну систему ProZorro відповідно до вимог Закону України «Про публічні закупівлі», що гарантує відкритість процедур і рівний доступ потенційних учасників. Тендерна документація формуватиметься з чіткими та недискримінаційними кваліфікаційними вимогами, що сприятиме залученню конкурентного кола підрядників. Контроль якості закупівель і виконання договорів забезпечуватиметься шляхом технічного та авторського нагляду, а також внутрішнього фінансового контролю замовника. Інформація про проведені закупівлі, укладені договори та хід реалізації проєкту підлягатиме публічному оприлюдненню у встановленому законодавством порядку, що забезпечить прозорість і підзвітність використання бюджетних коштів.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Pre-market engagement
Попереднє залучення ринку здійснювалося на етапі підготовки проєкту з метою оцінки наявних пропозицій, рівня конкуренції та орієнтовної вартості робіт. Для збору інформації було використано аналіз відкритих даних електронної системи ProZorro, зокрема огляд аналогічних тендерів з будівництва та облаштування захисних споруд у закладах освіти. Також проведено аналіз реалізованих і поточних проєктів у інших територіальних громадах Харківської області та суміжних регіонах. Для уточнення технічних і нормативних аспектів проєкту здійснювалися консультації з профільними фахівцями у сфері проєктування та будівництва об’єктів цивільного захисту. Отримана інформація була використана для формування технічних вимог, орієнтовної вартості проєкту та вибору оптимальної стратегії закупівель з урахуванням реального стану ринку.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Potential market participants
У процесі підготовки проєкту здійснювалися неформальні консультації з представниками ринку та профільними фахівцями у сфері проєктування і будівництва захисних споруд цивільного захисту. Консультації мали інформаційний характер та стосувалися орієнтовної вартості робіт, строків реалізації, технічних рішень і спроможності ринку виконувати подібні проєкти в умовах воєнного стану. Аналіз відкритих даних електронної системи ProZorro свідчить про наявність достатнього рівня конкуренції, зокрема серед підрядних організацій, що мають досвід будівництва об’єктів соціальної інфраструктури та захисних споруд. Потенційними учасниками закупівель можуть бути: • проєктні організації, що мають ліцензії та досвід проєктування об’єктів цивільного захисту; • будівельні компанії, які виконують загальнобудівельні та спеціалізовані роботи; • інженерні та експертні організації, що здійснюють технічний нагляд і експертизу проєктної документації.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Market readiness assessment
Ринок загалом готовий до реалізації проєктів будівництва та модернізації захисних споруд цивільного захисту для закладів загальної середньої освіти. В Україні наявна достатня кількість проєктних і будівельних організацій, які мають відповідні ліцензії, кваліфікований персонал та практичний досвід виконання аналогічних робіт у сфері соціальної інфраструктури. Основні технології, матеріали та інженерні рішення, необхідні для будівництва протирадіаційних укриттів, є доступними на внутрішньому ринку, а ланцюги постачання загалом функціонують стабільно. Також сформовано інституційну спроможність щодо проведення експертизи проєктної документації та технічного нагляду. Потенційними бар’єрами можуть бути коливання цін на будівельні матеріали, обмежені строки виконання робіт та регуляторні процедури погодження проєктної документації. Водночас зазначені ризики є типовими для будівельної галузі та можуть бути мінімізовані шляхом належного планування, застосування конкурентних процедур закупівель та поетапної реалізації проєкту.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget149'184'476 UAH18'000'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)149'184'476 UAH18'000'000 UAH
For preparation479'920 UAH2'000'000 UAH
For implementation148'704'556 UAH16'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost0 UAH0 UAH
For operation0 UAH0 UAH
For closing0 UAH0 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service UnitСередня вартість проєкту на одного отримувача послуги
Service Unit Cost5'348 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds147'093'162 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds147'093'162 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - economic analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - communication with stakeholders

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - risk management

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - social and gender analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - public consultations

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - legal support

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - demand analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - environmental expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of the market environment

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Environmental experts

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial consultants/modelers

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Legal consultants

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Commercial experts

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Technical experts

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Management experts / project managers

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
No

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Economic riskDefinedUndefined
Political riskDefinedUndefined
Social riskDefinedUndefined
Market riskDefinedUndefined
Environmental riskDefinedUndefined

Organizational events

ResponseDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable
Need for financing

Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
26/12/2025SP-L-261225-DC959073Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
11/01/2026SP-N-110126-CFA4AC7CState SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
28/12/2025SPP-L-281225-EA11CFD8Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-83