"Overhaul of the basement for the simplest shelter of the building of the commercial complex "LYCIUM No. 6 OF THE POKROV CITY COUNCIL OF DNIPROPETROVSK REGION" at the address: 6 Chiaturska St., Pokrov, Nikopolskyi district, Dnipropetrovsk region"


Sector
Education and science
Stream
Arrangement of civil defense structures (shelters) in educational institutions
Maturity level
80
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The simplest shelter is an underground structure designed to create conditions for the temporary stay of people (at least 48 hours) in the event of a danger to their life and health in order to reduce the indirect effects of conventional weapons during military (combat) operations and terrorist acts. The simplest shelter is designed for 100 places, two separate spaces of 50 places each, a total of 88 students and 12 staff members. The shelter is intended for the temporary stay of students of secondary and high schools. The MGN shelter is provided in the PRU, which is located separately in another three-story block of the educational institution.

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Improving the quality of services

Secondary Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The working project provides for the overhaul of the simplest basement shelter in the building of the commercial complex “Lyceum No. 6 of the Pokrov City Council of the Dnipropetrovsk Region” at 6 Chiaturska St., Pokrov, Nikopolsky District, Dnipropetrovsk Region. The overhaul of the basement for the arrangement of the simplest shelter provides for: - repair with the elimination of defects of existing reinforced concrete structures of floor slabs; - excavation of the existing backfill soil to increase the height of the underground floor premises to the possible size; - increasing the height and width of individual doorways with reinforcement; - interior decoration of walls, ceilings, floors; - installation of door blocks; - arrangement of brick partitions for the organization of the ventilation chamber, bathrooms, pump room, water supply; - installation of a door block with an extension to organize communication with the existing basement rooms that are in use; - restoration of the landscaping of the territory within the framework of laying engineering networks.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The simplest shelter is an underground space structure designed to create conditions for temporary residence of people (at least 48 hours) in the event of a danger to their life and health in order to reduce the indirect effects of conventional weapons during military (combat) operations and terrorist acts.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Maintenance costs per year

300000 UAH

Number of people who will use the service

100 human

Number of jobs, including for IDPs

2 human

Population in the geographical area of influence of the project

42192 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

Arrangement of civil defense structures (shelters) in educational institutions

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

2.2.3. Ensuring equal access to quality education in the Pokrovska urban territorial community of Dnipropetrovsk region and creating comfortable, safe, barrier-free conditions for all participants in the educational process

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Number
431 human
533 human

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Потреба безпечного розміщення здобувачів освіти та персоналу
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
25
533 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
111 Social Security Reference Structural Unit Lyceum 6.pdf
11.12.2025
13:10:22 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Major repairs to the simplest shelter

Technical Solution 2

New construction

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)8'172'585 UAH76'000'000 UAH
For preparation369'249 UAH1'000'000 UAH
For implementation7'803'336 UAH75'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost300'000 UAH2'500'000 UAH
For operation300'000 UAH2'000'000 UAH
For closing0 UAH500'000 UAH
Average annual costs300'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.6 months18 months
Deadline for developing a FFS2 months6 months
Implementation period4 months12 months
Service life360 months900 months
Target indicatorsDefined Not defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Pending

[The project initiator has not taken any decision about this alternative technical approach.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
1
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget8'472'585 UAH78'500'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)8'172'585 UAH76'000'000 UAH
For preparation369'249 UAH1'000'000 UAH
For implementation7'803'336 UAH75'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost300'000 UAH2'500'000 UAH
For operation300'000 UAH2'000'000 UAH
For closing0 UAH500'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service UnitВартість одиниці послуг
Service Unit Cost78'033 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
12/12/2025SP-L-121225-AFBE60AFCommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeInclude the direction in the SPI as a priority-
15/12/2025SPP-L-151225-3B9BD766Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeInclude the direction in the SPI as a priority80